Planner Autonomy: протащить catalog chain matches в runtime debug

This commit is contained in:
dctouch 2026-05-01 14:15:55 +03:00
parent 52a974d4d7
commit 1c1383b8b5
8 changed files with 60 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ The following consolidation step added catalog-level chain-template scoring:
- ranking-shaped value-flow ranks `value_flow_ranking` above the generic value-flow template;
- document/movement/inventory/lifecycle templates can now be inspected as catalog search results, not only as local planner branch constants;
- `assistantMcpDiscoveryPlanner` records the top catalog chain-template match in reason codes and exposes the ranked matches as `catalog_chain_template_matches` in the planner contract while preserving existing guarded execution behavior.
- the ranked chain-template matches are now propagated into runtime loop state and debug attachment fields, so replay analysis can inspect catalog-fabric intent without parsing reason-code strings.
## Why This Matters
@ -205,9 +206,16 @@ Latest validation after structured catalog chain-template contract exposure:
- `npm.cmd run build`: passed
- graphify rebuild: `5939 nodes`, `12906 edges`, `138 communities`
Latest validation after runtime/debug propagation of structured chain matches:
- targeted runtime/debug tests: passed, `18 passed`
- full MCP-discovery suite: passed, `282 passed`, `9 skipped`
- `npm.cmd run build`: passed
- graphify rebuild: `5940 nodes`, `12909 edges`, `137 communities`
## Next Step
The next safe step is still to re-run live replay once the 1C side is actively polling the proxy. In parallel, local-only consolidation can continue by making downstream planner/runtime arbitration consume `catalog_chain_template_matches` instead of relying on reason-code strings.
The next safe step is still to re-run live replay once the 1C side is actively polling the proxy. In parallel, local-only consolidation can continue by letting selected downstream arbitration consume `catalog_chain_template_matches` where this can be done without changing exact runtime behavior.
Recommended order:

View File

@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ It now documents a turnaround that is already operational in code, already mater
- runtime bridge and answer adapter now keep unsupported inventory route templates behind an explicit user-facing boundary instead of letting template planning look like confirmed stock/supplier/purchase/sale evidence;
- inventory catalog templates now bridge through existing exact inventory recipes (`41.01` scoped stock, supplier overlap, purchase provenance, and sale trace) inside the bounded MCP discovery pilot, while missing selected-item anchors still clarify instead of guessing;
- unambiguous metadata surfaces can now infer the next reviewed lane from `Document.*`, `Register.*`, or `Catalog.*` objects even before upstream labels `downstream_route_family`, while mixed surfaces still do not guess;
- catalog index now scores reviewed chain templates directly from fact/action/axis/comparison/ranking needs, and planner exposes ranked catalog chain matches in both reason codes and the structured `catalog_chain_template_matches` contract field;
- catalog index now scores reviewed chain templates directly from fact/action/axis/comparison/ranking needs, and planner/runtime/debug surfaces expose ranked catalog chain matches through the structured `catalog_chain_template_matches` contract path instead of relying only on reason-code strings;
- live map sync: [20 - planner_autonomy_consolidation_2026-05-01.md](./20%20-%20planner_autonomy_consolidation_2026-05-01.md)
Current honest status:
@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ Current honest status:
- open-world bounded-autonomy readiness: `~85%`
- Post-F semantic integrity module progress: `~99%` operationally closed, with remaining risk now treated as next-slice discovery rather than an open blocker inside the closed slice
- active inventory-stock breadth slice progress: `100%` for the declared scenario pack, not for arbitrary inventory questions
- Planner Autonomy Consolidation progress: `~81%` for the declared module, with catalog-fabric, value-flow arbitration, lifecycle bounded inference, broad-evaluation bridge, inventory catalog templates, inventory runtime-boundary honesty, exact inventory recipe bridging, unambiguous metadata-surface lane inference, catalog chain-template scoring, and structured chain-match contract exposure validated locally, but live replay for the new bridge is currently blocked by missing active 1C polling and broader unfamiliar 1C asks still need replay-backed growth
- graph snapshot after latest rebuild: `5939 nodes`, `12906 edges`, `138 communities`
- Planner Autonomy Consolidation progress: `~82%` for the declared module, with catalog-fabric, value-flow arbitration, lifecycle bounded inference, broad-evaluation bridge, inventory catalog templates, inventory runtime-boundary honesty, exact inventory recipe bridging, unambiguous metadata-surface lane inference, catalog chain-template scoring, structured chain-match contract exposure, and runtime/debug propagation validated locally, but live replay for the new bridge is currently blocked by missing active 1C polling and broader unfamiliar 1C asks still need replay-backed growth
- graph snapshot after latest rebuild: `5940 nodes`, `12909 edges`, `137 communities`
- current breakpoint:
- the validated hot paths are no longer structurally broken;
- flagship continuity collapse is no longer the primary risk;
@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ Latest live proof now includes:
- live inventory exact-bridge rerun `inventory_stock_exact_bridge_live_20260501_after_runtime_bridge` is recorded as infrastructure-blocked, not accepted: route/intent/recipe/capability matched, but MCP calls aborted and direct `get_metadata` timed out while proxy health showed `active_sessions_count=0` with pending commands
- catalog chain-template scoring accepted locally: catalog/planner slice passed `54/54`; full MCP-discovery slice passed `282/282` with `9` skipped; build passed; graphify rebuilt to `5938 nodes`, `12903 edges`, `139 communities`
- structured chain-template planner contract accepted locally: planner slice passed `36/36`; full MCP-discovery slice passed `282/282` with `9` skipped; build passed; graphify rebuilt to `5939 nodes`, `12906 edges`, `138 communities`
- structured chain-template runtime/debug propagation accepted locally: runtime/debug slice passed `18/18`; full MCP-discovery slice passed `282/282` with `9` skipped; build passed; graphify rebuilt to `5940 nodes`, `12909 edges`, `137 communities`
Current architectural reading:

View File

@ -15,6 +15,19 @@ function toNonEmptyString(value) {
const text = String(value).trim();
return text.length > 0 ? text : null;
}
function toStringArray(value) {
if (!Array.isArray(value)) {
return [];
}
const result = [];
for (const item of value) {
const text = toNonEmptyString(item);
if (text && !result.includes(text)) {
result.push(text);
}
}
return result;
}
function isMcpDiscoveryEntryPointContract(value) {
const record = toRecordObject(value);
return (record?.schema_version === "assistant_mcp_discovery_runtime_entry_point_v1" &&
@ -32,6 +45,7 @@ function resolveEntryPoint(input) {
function buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields(input) {
const entryPoint = resolveEntryPoint(input);
const bridge = toRecordObject(entryPoint?.bridge);
const planner = toRecordObject(bridge?.planner);
const answerDraft = toRecordObject(bridge?.answer_draft);
return {
assistant_mcp_discovery_entry_point_v1: entryPoint,
@ -39,6 +53,8 @@ function buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields(input) {
mcp_discovery_attempted: Boolean(entryPoint?.discovery_attempted),
mcp_discovery_hot_runtime_wired: false,
mcp_discovery_bridge_status: toNonEmptyString(bridge?.bridge_status),
mcp_discovery_selected_chain_id: toNonEmptyString(planner?.selected_chain_id),
mcp_discovery_catalog_chain_template_matches: toStringArray(planner?.catalog_chain_template_matches),
mcp_discovery_answer_mode: toNonEmptyString(answerDraft?.answer_mode),
mcp_discovery_business_fact_answer_allowed: bridge?.business_fact_answer_allowed === true,
mcp_discovery_user_facing_response_allowed: bridge?.user_facing_response_allowed === true,

View File

@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ function buildLoopState(planner, pilot, bridgeStatus) {
policy_owner: "assistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeBridge",
loop_status: loopStatusFor(bridgeStatus),
selected_chain_id: planner.selected_chain_id,
catalog_chain_template_matches: [...planner.catalog_chain_template_matches],
pilot_scope: pilot.pilot_scope,
asked_domain_family: planner.discovery_plan.turn_meaning_ref?.asked_domain_family ?? null,
asked_action_family: planner.discovery_plan.turn_meaning_ref?.asked_action_family ?? null,

View File

@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ export interface AssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields {
mcp_discovery_attempted: boolean;
mcp_discovery_hot_runtime_wired: false;
mcp_discovery_bridge_status: string | null;
mcp_discovery_selected_chain_id: string | null;
mcp_discovery_catalog_chain_template_matches: string[];
mcp_discovery_answer_mode: string | null;
mcp_discovery_business_fact_answer_allowed: boolean;
mcp_discovery_user_facing_response_allowed: boolean;
@ -32,6 +34,20 @@ function toNonEmptyString(value: unknown): string | null {
return text.length > 0 ? text : null;
}
function toStringArray(value: unknown): string[] {
if (!Array.isArray(value)) {
return [];
}
const result: string[] = [];
for (const item of value) {
const text = toNonEmptyString(item);
if (text && !result.includes(text)) {
result.push(text);
}
}
return result;
}
function isMcpDiscoveryEntryPointContract(value: unknown): value is AssistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeEntryPointContract {
const record = toRecordObject(value);
return (
@ -56,6 +72,7 @@ export function buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields(
): AssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields {
const entryPoint = resolveEntryPoint(input);
const bridge = toRecordObject(entryPoint?.bridge);
const planner = toRecordObject(bridge?.planner);
const answerDraft = toRecordObject(bridge?.answer_draft);
return {
@ -64,6 +81,8 @@ export function buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields(
mcp_discovery_attempted: Boolean(entryPoint?.discovery_attempted),
mcp_discovery_hot_runtime_wired: false,
mcp_discovery_bridge_status: toNonEmptyString(bridge?.bridge_status),
mcp_discovery_selected_chain_id: toNonEmptyString(planner?.selected_chain_id),
mcp_discovery_catalog_chain_template_matches: toStringArray(planner?.catalog_chain_template_matches),
mcp_discovery_answer_mode: toNonEmptyString(answerDraft?.answer_mode),
mcp_discovery_business_fact_answer_allowed: bridge?.business_fact_answer_allowed === true,
mcp_discovery_user_facing_response_allowed: bridge?.user_facing_response_allowed === true,

View File

@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ export interface AssistantMcpDiscoveryLoopStateContract {
policy_owner: "assistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeBridge";
loop_status: AssistantMcpDiscoveryLoopStatus;
selected_chain_id: AssistantMcpDiscoveryChainId;
catalog_chain_template_matches: AssistantMcpDiscoveryPlannerContract["catalog_chain_template_matches"];
pilot_scope: AssistantMcpDiscoveryPilotExecutionContract["pilot_scope"];
asked_domain_family: string | null;
asked_action_family: string | null;
@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ function buildLoopState(
policy_owner: "assistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeBridge",
loop_status: loopStatusFor(bridgeStatus),
selected_chain_id: planner.selected_chain_id,
catalog_chain_template_matches: [...planner.catalog_chain_template_matches],
pilot_scope: pilot.pilot_scope,
asked_domain_family: planner.discovery_plan.turn_meaning_ref?.asked_domain_family ?? null,
asked_action_family: planner.discovery_plan.turn_meaning_ref?.asked_action_family ?? null,

View File

@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ function entryPointContract(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
user_facing_response_allowed: true,
business_fact_answer_allowed: true,
requires_user_clarification: false,
planner: {
selected_chain_id: "value_flow_ranking",
catalog_chain_template_matches: ["value_flow_ranking", "value_flow"]
},
answer_draft: {
answer_mode: "confirmed_with_bounded_inference"
}
@ -37,6 +41,8 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery debug attachment", () => {
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_attempted).toBe(true);
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_hot_runtime_wired).toBe(false);
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_bridge_status).toBe("answer_draft_ready");
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_selected_chain_id).toBe("value_flow_ranking");
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_catalog_chain_template_matches).toEqual(["value_flow_ranking", "value_flow"]);
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_answer_mode).toBe("confirmed_with_bounded_inference");
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_business_fact_answer_allowed).toBe(true);
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_user_facing_response_allowed).toBe(true);
@ -54,6 +60,8 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery debug attachment", () => {
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_attempted).toBe(false);
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_hot_runtime_wired).toBe(false);
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_bridge_status).toBeNull();
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_selected_chain_id).toBeNull();
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_catalog_chain_template_matches).toEqual([]);
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_answer_mode).toBeNull();
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_business_fact_answer_allowed).toBe(false);
expect(debug.mcp_discovery_user_facing_response_allowed).toBe(false);

View File

@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery runtime bridge", () => {
});
expect(result.loop_state.pending_axes).toContain("organization");
expect(result.loop_state.provided_axes).toContain("aggregate_axis");
expect(result.loop_state.catalog_chain_template_matches[0]).toBe("value_flow_ranking");
expect(result.reason_codes).toContain("runtime_bridge_loop_state_awaiting_clarification");
});