Planner Autonomy: протащить catalog chain matches в runtime debug

docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/20 - planner_autonomy_consolidation_2026-05-01.md

@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ The following consolidation step added catalog-level chain-template scoring:
 - ranking-shaped value-flow ranks `value_flow_ranking` above the generic value-flow template;
 - document/movement/inventory/lifecycle templates can now be inspected as catalog search results, not only as local planner branch constants;
 - `assistantMcpDiscoveryPlanner` records the top catalog chain-template match in reason codes and exposes the ranked matches as `catalog_chain_template_matches` in the planner contract while preserving existing guarded execution behavior.
+- the ranked chain-template matches are now propagated into runtime loop state and debug attachment fields, so replay analysis can inspect catalog-fabric intent without parsing reason-code strings.
 
 ## Why This Matters
 
@@ -205,9 +206,16 @@ Latest validation after structured catalog chain-template contract exposure:
 - `npm.cmd run build`: passed
 - graphify rebuild: `5939 nodes`, `12906 edges`, `138 communities`
 
+Latest validation after runtime/debug propagation of structured chain matches:
+
+- targeted runtime/debug tests: passed, `18 passed`
+- full MCP-discovery suite: passed, `282 passed`, `9 skipped`
+- `npm.cmd run build`: passed
+- graphify rebuild: `5940 nodes`, `12909 edges`, `137 communities`
+
 ## Next Step
 
-The next safe step is still to re-run live replay once the 1C side is actively polling the proxy. In parallel, local-only consolidation can continue by making downstream planner/runtime arbitration consume `catalog_chain_template_matches` instead of relying on reason-code strings.
+The next safe step is still to re-run live replay once the 1C side is actively polling the proxy. In parallel, local-only consolidation can continue by letting selected downstream arbitration consume `catalog_chain_template_matches` where this can be done without changing exact runtime behavior.
 
 Recommended order:
 

docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/README.md

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ It now documents a turnaround that is already operational in code, already mater
   - runtime bridge and answer adapter now keep unsupported inventory route templates behind an explicit user-facing boundary instead of letting template planning look like confirmed stock/supplier/purchase/sale evidence;
   - inventory catalog templates now bridge through existing exact inventory recipes (`41.01` scoped stock, supplier overlap, purchase provenance, and sale trace) inside the bounded MCP discovery pilot, while missing selected-item anchors still clarify instead of guessing;
   - unambiguous metadata surfaces can now infer the next reviewed lane from `Document.*`, `Register.*`, or `Catalog.*` objects even before upstream labels `downstream_route_family`, while mixed surfaces still do not guess;
-  - catalog index now scores reviewed chain templates directly from fact/action/axis/comparison/ranking needs, and planner exposes ranked catalog chain matches in both reason codes and the structured `catalog_chain_template_matches` contract field;
+  - catalog index now scores reviewed chain templates directly from fact/action/axis/comparison/ranking needs, and planner/runtime/debug surfaces expose ranked catalog chain matches through the structured `catalog_chain_template_matches` contract path instead of relying only on reason-code strings;
   - live map sync: [20 - planner_autonomy_consolidation_2026-05-01.md](./20%20-%20planner_autonomy_consolidation_2026-05-01.md)
 
 Current honest status:
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ Current honest status:
 - open-world bounded-autonomy readiness: `~85%`
 - Post-F semantic integrity module progress: `~99%` operationally closed, with remaining risk now treated as next-slice discovery rather than an open blocker inside the closed slice
 - active inventory-stock breadth slice progress: `100%` for the declared scenario pack, not for arbitrary inventory questions
-- Planner Autonomy Consolidation progress: `~81%` for the declared module, with catalog-fabric, value-flow arbitration, lifecycle bounded inference, broad-evaluation bridge, inventory catalog templates, inventory runtime-boundary honesty, exact inventory recipe bridging, unambiguous metadata-surface lane inference, catalog chain-template scoring, and structured chain-match contract exposure validated locally, but live replay for the new bridge is currently blocked by missing active 1C polling and broader unfamiliar 1C asks still need replay-backed growth
+- Planner Autonomy Consolidation progress: `~82%` for the declared module, with catalog-fabric, value-flow arbitration, lifecycle bounded inference, broad-evaluation bridge, inventory catalog templates, inventory runtime-boundary honesty, exact inventory recipe bridging, unambiguous metadata-surface lane inference, catalog chain-template scoring, structured chain-match contract exposure, and runtime/debug propagation validated locally, but live replay for the new bridge is currently blocked by missing active 1C polling and broader unfamiliar 1C asks still need replay-backed growth
-- graph snapshot after latest rebuild: `5939 nodes`, `12906 edges`, `138 communities`
+- graph snapshot after latest rebuild: `5940 nodes`, `12909 edges`, `137 communities`
 - current breakpoint:
   - the validated hot paths are no longer structurally broken;
   - flagship continuity collapse is no longer the primary risk;
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ Latest live proof now includes:
 - live inventory exact-bridge rerun `inventory_stock_exact_bridge_live_20260501_after_runtime_bridge` is recorded as infrastructure-blocked, not accepted: route/intent/recipe/capability matched, but MCP calls aborted and direct `get_metadata` timed out while proxy health showed `active_sessions_count=0` with pending commands
 - catalog chain-template scoring accepted locally: catalog/planner slice passed `54/54`; full MCP-discovery slice passed `282/282` with `9` skipped; build passed; graphify rebuilt to `5938 nodes`, `12903 edges`, `139 communities`
 - structured chain-template planner contract accepted locally: planner slice passed `36/36`; full MCP-discovery slice passed `282/282` with `9` skipped; build passed; graphify rebuilt to `5939 nodes`, `12906 edges`, `138 communities`
+- structured chain-template runtime/debug propagation accepted locally: runtime/debug slice passed `18/18`; full MCP-discovery slice passed `282/282` with `9` skipped; build passed; graphify rebuilt to `5940 nodes`, `12909 edges`, `137 communities`
 
 Current architectural reading:
 

llm_normalizer/backend/dist/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachment.js

@@ -15,6 +15,19 @@ function toNonEmptyString(value) {
     const text = String(value).trim();
     return text.length > 0 ? text : null;
 }
+function toStringArray(value) {
+    if (!Array.isArray(value)) {
+        return [];
+    }
+    const result = [];
+    for (const item of value) {
+        const text = toNonEmptyString(item);
+        if (text && !result.includes(text)) {
+            result.push(text);
+        }
+    }
+    return result;
+}
 function isMcpDiscoveryEntryPointContract(value) {
     const record = toRecordObject(value);
     return (record?.schema_version === "assistant_mcp_discovery_runtime_entry_point_v1" &&
@@ -32,6 +45,7 @@ function resolveEntryPoint(input) {
 function buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields(input) {
     const entryPoint = resolveEntryPoint(input);
     const bridge = toRecordObject(entryPoint?.bridge);
+    const planner = toRecordObject(bridge?.planner);
     const answerDraft = toRecordObject(bridge?.answer_draft);
     return {
         assistant_mcp_discovery_entry_point_v1: entryPoint,
@@ -39,6 +53,8 @@ function buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields(input) {
         mcp_discovery_attempted: Boolean(entryPoint?.discovery_attempted),
         mcp_discovery_hot_runtime_wired: false,
         mcp_discovery_bridge_status: toNonEmptyString(bridge?.bridge_status),
+        mcp_discovery_selected_chain_id: toNonEmptyString(planner?.selected_chain_id),
+        mcp_discovery_catalog_chain_template_matches: toStringArray(planner?.catalog_chain_template_matches),
         mcp_discovery_answer_mode: toNonEmptyString(answerDraft?.answer_mode),
         mcp_discovery_business_fact_answer_allowed: bridge?.business_fact_answer_allowed === true,
         mcp_discovery_user_facing_response_allowed: bridge?.user_facing_response_allowed === true,

llm_normalizer/backend/dist/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeBridge.js

@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ function buildLoopState(planner, pilot, bridgeStatus) {
         policy_owner: "assistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeBridge",
         loop_status: loopStatusFor(bridgeStatus),
         selected_chain_id: planner.selected_chain_id,
+        catalog_chain_template_matches: [...planner.catalog_chain_template_matches],
         pilot_scope: pilot.pilot_scope,
         asked_domain_family: planner.discovery_plan.turn_meaning_ref?.asked_domain_family ?? null,
         asked_action_family: planner.discovery_plan.turn_meaning_ref?.asked_action_family ?? null,

llm_normalizer/backend/src/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachment.ts

@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ export interface AssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields {
   mcp_discovery_attempted: boolean;
   mcp_discovery_hot_runtime_wired: false;
   mcp_discovery_bridge_status: string | null;
+  mcp_discovery_selected_chain_id: string | null;
+  mcp_discovery_catalog_chain_template_matches: string[];
   mcp_discovery_answer_mode: string | null;
   mcp_discovery_business_fact_answer_allowed: boolean;
   mcp_discovery_user_facing_response_allowed: boolean;
@@ -32,6 +34,20 @@ function toNonEmptyString(value: unknown): string | null {
   return text.length > 0 ? text : null;
 }
 
+function toStringArray(value: unknown): string[] {
+  if (!Array.isArray(value)) {
+    return [];
+  }
+  const result: string[] = [];
+  for (const item of value) {
+    const text = toNonEmptyString(item);
+    if (text && !result.includes(text)) {
+      result.push(text);
+    }
+  }
+  return result;
+}
+
 function isMcpDiscoveryEntryPointContract(value: unknown): value is AssistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeEntryPointContract {
   const record = toRecordObject(value);
   return (
@@ -56,6 +72,7 @@ export function buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields(
 ): AssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields {
   const entryPoint = resolveEntryPoint(input);
   const bridge = toRecordObject(entryPoint?.bridge);
+  const planner = toRecordObject(bridge?.planner);
   const answerDraft = toRecordObject(bridge?.answer_draft);
 
   return {
@@ -64,6 +81,8 @@ export function buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachmentFields(
     mcp_discovery_attempted: Boolean(entryPoint?.discovery_attempted),
     mcp_discovery_hot_runtime_wired: false,
     mcp_discovery_bridge_status: toNonEmptyString(bridge?.bridge_status),
+    mcp_discovery_selected_chain_id: toNonEmptyString(planner?.selected_chain_id),
+    mcp_discovery_catalog_chain_template_matches: toStringArray(planner?.catalog_chain_template_matches),
     mcp_discovery_answer_mode: toNonEmptyString(answerDraft?.answer_mode),
     mcp_discovery_business_fact_answer_allowed: bridge?.business_fact_answer_allowed === true,
     mcp_discovery_user_facing_response_allowed: bridge?.user_facing_response_allowed === true,

llm_normalizer/backend/src/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeBridge.ts

@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ export interface AssistantMcpDiscoveryLoopStateContract {
   policy_owner: "assistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeBridge";
   loop_status: AssistantMcpDiscoveryLoopStatus;
   selected_chain_id: AssistantMcpDiscoveryChainId;
+  catalog_chain_template_matches: AssistantMcpDiscoveryPlannerContract["catalog_chain_template_matches"];
   pilot_scope: AssistantMcpDiscoveryPilotExecutionContract["pilot_scope"];
   asked_domain_family: string | null;
   asked_action_family: string | null;
@@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ function buildLoopState(
     policy_owner: "assistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeBridge",
     loop_status: loopStatusFor(bridgeStatus),
     selected_chain_id: planner.selected_chain_id,
+    catalog_chain_template_matches: [...planner.catalog_chain_template_matches],
     pilot_scope: pilot.pilot_scope,
     asked_domain_family: planner.discovery_plan.turn_meaning_ref?.asked_domain_family ?? null,
     asked_action_family: planner.discovery_plan.turn_meaning_ref?.asked_action_family ?? null,

llm_normalizer/backend/tests/assistantMcpDiscoveryDebugAttachment.test.ts

@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ function entryPointContract(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
       user_facing_response_allowed: true,
       business_fact_answer_allowed: true,
       requires_user_clarification: false,
+      planner: {
+        selected_chain_id: "value_flow_ranking",
+        catalog_chain_template_matches: ["value_flow_ranking", "value_flow"]
+      },
       answer_draft: {
         answer_mode: "confirmed_with_bounded_inference"
       }
@@ -37,6 +41,8 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery debug attachment", () => {
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_attempted).toBe(true);
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_hot_runtime_wired).toBe(false);
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_bridge_status).toBe("answer_draft_ready");
+    expect(debug.mcp_discovery_selected_chain_id).toBe("value_flow_ranking");
+    expect(debug.mcp_discovery_catalog_chain_template_matches).toEqual(["value_flow_ranking", "value_flow"]);
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_answer_mode).toBe("confirmed_with_bounded_inference");
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_business_fact_answer_allowed).toBe(true);
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_user_facing_response_allowed).toBe(true);
@@ -54,6 +60,8 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery debug attachment", () => {
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_attempted).toBe(false);
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_hot_runtime_wired).toBe(false);
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_bridge_status).toBeNull();
+    expect(debug.mcp_discovery_selected_chain_id).toBeNull();
+    expect(debug.mcp_discovery_catalog_chain_template_matches).toEqual([]);
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_answer_mode).toBeNull();
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_business_fact_answer_allowed).toBe(false);
     expect(debug.mcp_discovery_user_facing_response_allowed).toBe(false);

llm_normalizer/backend/tests/assistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeBridge.test.ts

@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery runtime bridge", () => {
     });
     expect(result.loop_state.pending_axes).toContain("organization");
     expect(result.loop_state.provided_axes).toContain("aggregate_axis");
+    expect(result.loop_state.catalog_chain_template_matches[0]).toBe("value_flow_ranking");
     expect(result.reason_codes).toContain("runtime_bridge_loop_state_awaiting_clarification");
   });