diff --git a/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/06 - phase_acceptance_matrix.md b/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/06 - phase_acceptance_matrix.md
index b6fc3f9..b0f4aef 100644
--- a/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/06 - phase_acceptance_matrix.md	
+++ b/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/06 - phase_acceptance_matrix.md	
@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ Current reporting baseline:
 - Planner Autonomy Consolidation: `100%` for the declared phase83 slice.
 - Open-World Business Overview implementation breadth: `~99%` through Slice 25.
 - Open-World Semantic Control Gate: accepted critical subset after EHMO/W5/W7 hardening; fat GUI pack review remains a broad human-pressure gate.
-- Route-Candidate-Driven Enablement Loop: `100%`, now regression-gated by phase91-phase97 canaries.
-- Open-World Schema/Primitive Discovery: `25%`, first financial-counterparty slice accepted live at `4/4`; next schema/primitive candidate should come from real live/manual replay evidence.
+- Route-Candidate-Driven Enablement Loop: `100%`, now regression-gated by phase91-phase98 canaries.
+- Open-World Schema/Primitive Discovery: `38%`, financial-counterparty slice accepted live at `4/4` and limit-honesty/business-language gate accepted live at `6/6`; next schema/primitive candidate should come from real live/manual replay evidence.
 
 ## Archived Execution Snapshot (2026-04-17)
 
diff --git a/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/21 - current_status_canon_2026-05-01.md b/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/21 - current_status_canon_2026-05-01.md
index efe3538..6913f08 100644
--- a/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/21 - current_status_canon_2026-05-01.md	
+++ b/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/21 - current_status_canon_2026-05-01.md	
@@ -86,11 +86,12 @@ Fresh validation cut:
 - Completed autonomy slice inside that loop: `Vendor/Procurement Quality Reviewed Route`: `vendor_risk_procurement_quality` now promotes to reviewed procurement-concentration evidence when confirmed outgoing payment, bank-like recipient segregation, non-financial recipient, counterparty-role, and contract-usage signals are reachable; phase95 live replay is accepted.
 - Completed autonomy slice inside that loop: `Inventory Reserve/Liquidation Quality Reviewed Route`: `inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality` now promotes to reviewed inventory quality-event evidence from posted write-off, receipt-adjustment, stocktaking, and revaluation documents; phase96 live replay is accepted.
 - Completed broader schema/primitive discovery slice: `Financial Counterparty Flow Hints`: bank-document money-flow recipes expose operation/purpose/comment fields, ranked value-flow buckets carry `financial_flow_hint`, explicit `СБЕРБАНК` wording is not swallowed by supplier/customer tails, and bank-like leaders are bounded away from ordinary supplier/customer overclaim; phase97 live replay is accepted.
-- Current live canary: `phase97_financial_counterparty_flow_hints_live4` accepted `4/4`.
-- Current accepted autorun: `AGENT | Phase 97 financial counterparty flow hints replay` (`gen-ag05122250-4451a8`).
+- Completed broader schema/primitive discovery support slice: `Limit Honesty And Business Language Gate`: compact business-overview replies sanitize route/proxy/MCP-style wording, keep row-limit disclosure relevant to the asked contour, and preserve debt/VAT/bank/inventory/supplier canaries; phase98 live replay is accepted.
+- Current live canary: `phase98_limit_honesty_business_language_live3` accepted `6/6`.
+- Current accepted autorun: `AGENT | Phase 98 limit honesty and business-language replay` (`gen-ag05122315-f1e27c`).
 - Implementation breadth: `~99% (Open-World Bounded Autonomy Breadth through Slice 25)`.
-- Active broader autonomy module: `Open-World Schema/Primitive Discovery`, with the first `Financial Counterparty Flow Hints` slice accepted and saved.
-- Next active slice: select the next unfamiliar 1C ask from live/manual replay evidence, then continue broader schema/primitive discovery while using phase91-phase97 as regression canaries.
+- Active broader autonomy module: `Open-World Schema/Primitive Discovery`, with `Financial Counterparty Flow Hints` and `Limit Honesty And Business Language Gate` accepted and saved.
+- Next active slice: select the next unfamiliar 1C ask from live/manual replay evidence, then continue broader schema/primitive discovery while using phase91-phase98 as regression canaries.
 - Operating-layer progress: `~99% (Agentic Semantic Development Loop, accepted dogfood loop + autorun hygiene; manual GUI confirmation still required)`.
 
 ## Reporting Rule
@@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ Use these labels when reporting progress:
 - `Прогресс модуля: 99% (Agentic Semantic Development Loop, accepted dogfood loop + autorun hygiene; manual GUI confirmation still required)` when discussing the current development-loop operating layer.
 - `Прогресс модуля: 100% (Open-World Route Candidate Promotion, declared phase90 slice accepted)` when discussing the route-candidate handoff slice itself.
 - `Прогресс модуля: 100% (Route-Candidate-Driven Enablement Loop, final reviewed proof-family route accepted; use as regression gate)` when discussing the current candidate-driven enablement loop.
-- `Прогресс модуля: 25% (Open-World Schema/Primitive Discovery, first financial-counterparty slice accepted; next schema/primitive candidate pending)` when discussing the current broader schema/primitive discovery module.
+- `Прогресс модуля: 38% (Open-World Schema/Primitive Discovery, phase97 financial-counterparty slice and phase98 business-language gate accepted; next schema/primitive candidate pending)` when discussing the current broader schema/primitive discovery module.
 - `Open-World Business Overview implementation breadth: ~99%, Semantic Control Gate critical subset accepted, fat GUI pack still pending` when discussing only the already wired Slice 25 breadth.
 - `Прогресс модуля: X% (Open-World Bounded Autonomy Breadth, active slice: <name>)` for later breadth work after the Semantic Control Gate is accepted.
 
@@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ Remaining work belongs to the next breadth module:
 - confirm the latest autorun Cyrillic hygiene cut in the GUI after backend refresh and inspect frontend/API payloads if old replacement characters remain visible;
 - continue dogfooding the `Agentic Semantic Development Loop` on real stage packs, especially generated-question quality, semantic business audit, repair handoff, and rerun acceptance;
 - finish closure of the `Open-World Semantic Control Gate` opened by `assistant-stage1-EHMOy3lNFt`; the EHMO-derived critical subset is accepted live after W5/W7 hardening, but the fat GUI pack and residual answer-shape roughness still need final review;
-- extend open-world coverage beyond the reviewed `business_overview` families already wired for money-flow/activity, customer and supplier concentration, document/account-section activity mix, counterparty role split, contract usage, yearly operating-flow dynamics, explicit profit/margin, debt due-date aging, inventory reserve/liquidation quality events, supplier/procurement quality, bank-like financial counterparty role/purpose hints, explicit-period VAT/tax, as-of-date debt and inventory position, open-settlement concentration, contract-date debt age, staleness proxies, trading-margin proxy, sales-to-stock inventory proxy, the missing-proof ledger, and the phase93-phase97 reviewed/canary routes;
+- extend open-world coverage beyond the reviewed `business_overview` families already wired for money-flow/activity, customer and supplier concentration, document/account-section activity mix, counterparty role split, contract usage, yearly operating-flow dynamics, explicit profit/margin, debt due-date aging, inventory reserve/liquidation quality events, supplier/procurement quality, bank-like financial counterparty role/purpose hints, business-language/limit-honesty gating, explicit-period VAT/tax, as-of-date debt and inventory position, open-settlement concentration, contract-date debt age, staleness proxies, trading-margin proxy, sales-to-stock inventory proxy, the missing-proof ledger, and the phase93-phase98 reviewed/canary routes;
 - broader dynamic schema traversal for unfamiliar 1C asks;
 - more primitive descriptors where live evidence proves a real gap;
 - more replay-backed domain packs that start from user business meaning, not from route convenience;
@@ -161,19 +162,20 @@ For current planning, read:
 1. `README.md`
 2. this document
 3. `31 - inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md`
-4. `32 - financial_counterparty_flow_hints_2026-05-13.md`
-5. `30 - vendor_procurement_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md`
-6. `29 - debt_due_date_aging_reviewed_route_2026-05-10.md`
-7. `28 - accounting_profit_margin_reviewed_route_2026-05-10.md`
-8. `27 - proof_family_enablement_candidates_2026-05-10.md`
-9. `26 - route_candidate_driven_enablement_loop_2026-05-10.md`
-10. `25 - open_world_route_candidate_promotion_2026-05-10.md`
-11. `24 - agentic_semantic_development_loop_and_autorun_hygiene_2026-05-10.md`
-12. `23 - current_execution_spine_and_semantic_control_gate_2026-05-05.md`
-13. `22 - open_world_bounded_autonomy_breadth_2026-05-01.md`
-14. `20 - planner_autonomy_consolidation_2026-05-01.md`
-15. `19 - inventory_stock_open_world_breadth_proof_2026-05-01.md`
-16. `17 - post_f_semantic_integrity_hardening_2026-04-23.md`
-17. `16 - data_need_graph_and_open_world_mcp_plan_2026-04-22.md`
+4. `33 - limit_honesty_business_language_2026-05-13.md`
+5. `32 - financial_counterparty_flow_hints_2026-05-13.md`
+6. `30 - vendor_procurement_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md`
+7. `29 - debt_due_date_aging_reviewed_route_2026-05-10.md`
+8. `28 - accounting_profit_margin_reviewed_route_2026-05-10.md`
+9. `27 - proof_family_enablement_candidates_2026-05-10.md`
+10. `26 - route_candidate_driven_enablement_loop_2026-05-10.md`
+11. `25 - open_world_route_candidate_promotion_2026-05-10.md`
+12. `24 - agentic_semantic_development_loop_and_autorun_hygiene_2026-05-10.md`
+13. `23 - current_execution_spine_and_semantic_control_gate_2026-05-05.md`
+14. `22 - open_world_bounded_autonomy_breadth_2026-05-01.md`
+15. `20 - planner_autonomy_consolidation_2026-05-01.md`
+16. `19 - inventory_stock_open_world_breadth_proof_2026-05-01.md`
+17. `17 - post_f_semantic_integrity_hardening_2026-04-23.md`
+18. `16 - data_need_graph_and_open_world_mcp_plan_2026-04-22.md`
 
 Documents `01` through `15` remain valuable, but mostly as the historical architecture trail.
diff --git a/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/33 - limit_honesty_business_language_2026-05-13.md b/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/33 - limit_honesty_business_language_2026-05-13.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..69bb900
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/33 - limit_honesty_business_language_2026-05-13.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# 33 - Limit Honesty And Business Language Gate (2026-05-13)
+
+This note records the second accepted cut in the broader `Open-World Schema/Primitive Discovery` module.
+
+The trigger came from the real GUI review `assistant-stage1-v2qsm_R0fF`: several answers were factually bounded, but still felt like technical artifacts because they leaked `MCP`, `route`, `proxy`, or irrelevant row-limit wording into user-facing business answers.
+
+## Scope
+
+This cut keeps the data and routes unchanged, but hardens the answer surface:
+
+- compact business-overview replies now pass through a shared business-language sanitizer before they are returned;
+- `procurement-concentration route`, `vendor-risk route`, `due-date route`, and `proxy` phrases are converted into business-readable wording;
+- debt due-date boundary answers keep the organization in the direct line and explain missing payment terms without route jargon;
+- inventory reserve answers no longer pull unrelated incoming/outgoing money-flow limit lines into a warehouse reserve question;
+- supplier dependency answers distinguish "checked concentration of outgoing payments" from a complete supplier-risk audit without naming it as a route;
+- accepted replay keeps VAT and bank-like counterparty boundary canaries in the same scenario.
+
+## Validation
+
+Local checks:
+
+- `npm.cmd test -- assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.test.ts`: `26/26` passed;
+- `npm.cmd test -- assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.test.ts assistantMcpDiscoveryAnswerAdapter.test.ts assistantMcpDiscoveryPilotExecutor.test.ts addressQueryRuntimeM23.test.ts`: `519/519` passed, `1` skipped;
+- `npm.cmd run build`: passed;
+- graphify rebuild: `6484` nodes, `14385` edges, `142` communities.
+
+Live semantic replay:
+
+- spec: `docs/orchestration/address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language.json`;
+- accepted run: `artifacts/domain_runs/phase98_limit_honesty_business_language_live3`;
+- final status: `accepted`, `6/6` passed, `0` warnings, `0` failures;
+- accepted user-runnable autorun: `AGENT | Phase 98 limit honesty and business-language replay` (`gen-ag05122315-f1e27c`).
+
+The accepted replay proves:
+
+- overdue receivables answers state the organization, date, checked open-settlement amount, and missing payment-term basis in business language;
+- short follow-up questions remain short and do not repeat technical limit text;
+- VAT remains direct and debug-free;
+- top incoming money keeps the bank boundary and does not overclaim bank inflows as ordinary customer revenue;
+- inventory reserve answers say the reserve cannot be confirmed exactly and do not drag unrelated money-flow limit warnings into the warehouse answer;
+- supplier dependency answers state that exact supplier-risk is not fully confirmed, show the checked concentration leader, and list what remains unproven.
+
+## Status
+
+Current module wording:
+
+`Open-World Schema/Primitive Discovery, completed slice: limit honesty and business-language gate`
+
+Slice progress: `100%`.
+
+Broader module progress: `38%`.
+
+This is not a new 1C primitive by itself. It is a necessary semantic gate for the broader primitive-discovery module: as coverage grows, bounded answers must stay business-readable and must not expose internal route/proxy/debug mechanics.
+
+## Next Work
+
+1. Treat phase98 as a regression canary together with phase91-phase97.
+2. Pick the next unfamiliar 1C ask from live/manual replay evidence.
+3. Prefer the same loop: business meaning -> route candidate/schema surface -> minimal reviewed primitive or answer-shape fix -> live replay -> save autorun only after accepted replay.
+4. Keep watching for cases where a technically correct bounded answer still feels like a system artifact rather than a competent business analyst.
+
+See also:
+
+- [21 - current_status_canon_2026-05-01.md](./21%20-%20current_status_canon_2026-05-01.md)
+- [32 - financial_counterparty_flow_hints_2026-05-13.md](./32%20-%20financial_counterparty_flow_hints_2026-05-13.md)
diff --git a/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/README.md b/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/README.md
index a8befea..0268086 100644
--- a/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/README.md	
+++ b/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/README.md	
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ This package answers the next question:
 30. [30 - vendor_procurement_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md](./30%20-%20vendor_procurement_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md)
 31. [31 - inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md](./31%20-%20inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md)
 32. [32 - financial_counterparty_flow_hints_2026-05-13.md](./32%20-%20financial_counterparty_flow_hints_2026-05-13.md)
+33. [33 - limit_honesty_business_language_2026-05-13.md](./33%20-%20limit_honesty_business_language_2026-05-13.md)
 
 ## Current Status Snapshot (2026-05-13)
 
@@ -109,6 +110,8 @@ Status canon for planning:
 - The accepted user-runnable autorun for that slice is `AGENT | Phase 96 inventory reserve/liquidation quality-events` (`gen-ag05122057-c9786e`).
 - The first broader schema/primitive discovery slice is now accepted: `financial counterparty flow hints` adds bank-document purpose/operation/comment hints, protects bank-like counterparties from ordinary supplier/customer overclaim, and keeps normal counterparty net-flow canaries healthy; `phase97_financial_counterparty_flow_hints_live4` passed `4/4`.
 - The accepted user-runnable autorun for that slice is `AGENT | Phase 97 financial counterparty flow hints replay` (`gen-ag05122250-4451a8`).
+- The second broader schema/primitive discovery support slice is now accepted: `limit honesty and business-language gate` sanitizes route/proxy/MCP-style answer wording, keeps row-limit disclosure relevant to the asked business contour, and preserves debt/VAT/bank/inventory/supplier canaries; `phase98_limit_honesty_business_language_live3` passed `6/6`.
+- The accepted user-runnable autorun for that slice is `AGENT | Phase 98 limit honesty and business-language replay` (`gen-ag05122315-f1e27c`).
 - The phase94 replay spec was repaired to real UTF-8 Russian before autorun persistence, so the saved user-runnable pack does not repeat the earlier GUI mojibake/card-text regression.
 - The short source of truth for status wording is [21 - current_status_canon_2026-05-01.md](./21%20-%20current_status_canon_2026-05-01.md).
 - The current execution spine after EHMO is [23 - current_execution_spine_and_semantic_control_gate_2026-05-05.md](./23%20-%20current_execution_spine_and_semantic_control_gate_2026-05-05.md).
@@ -121,6 +124,7 @@ Status canon for planning:
 - The third reviewed proof-family route slice is [30 - vendor_procurement_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md](./30%20-%20vendor_procurement_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md).
 - The fourth/final reviewed proof-family route slice is [31 - inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md](./31%20-%20inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md).
 - The first broader schema/primitive discovery slice is [32 - financial_counterparty_flow_hints_2026-05-13.md](./32%20-%20financial_counterparty_flow_hints_2026-05-13.md), now accepted live and saved as a user-runnable AGENT autorun.
+- The second broader schema/primitive discovery support slice is [33 - limit_honesty_business_language_2026-05-13.md](./33%20-%20limit_honesty_business_language_2026-05-13.md), now accepted live and saved as a user-runnable AGENT autorun.
 
 It now documents a turnaround that is already operational in code, already materially past the acute regression breakpoint, and already moved through bounded MCP autonomy, Post-F hardening, inventory breadth proof, and the declared Planner Autonomy slice:
 
@@ -191,7 +195,7 @@ Current honest status:
 - Planner Autonomy Consolidation progress: `100%` for the declared module, with catalog-fabric, value-flow arbitration, lifecycle bounded inference, broad-evaluation bridge, inventory catalog templates, inventory runtime-boundary honesty, exact inventory recipe bridging, unambiguous metadata-surface lane inference, catalog chain-template scoring, structured chain-match contract exposure, runtime/debug propagation, subject-aware bidirectional comparison arbitration, structured catalog-alignment verdicts, representative alignment regression guard, catalog-alignment reason-code telemetry, explicit `alignment_status` propagation, truth-harness/acceptance-matrix surfacing, soft divergence warning, `catalog_alignment_ok` acceptance invariant, step-level expected catalog-alignment assertions, phase66 and phase32 spec alignment expectations, AGENT source-catalog surfacing, generated phase83 mixed planner-brain replay spec, checked-source user-facing error sanitation, surface-grounded catalog promotion, and guarded live phase83 acceptance validated. Broader unfamiliar 1C asks are now next-module breadth work rather than an open blocker inside this declared slice
 - Open-World Route Candidate Promotion progress: `100%` for the declared phase90 slice, with structured `route_candidate` runtime contract, artifact propagation, live semantic replay accepted at `5/5`, and accepted AGENT autorun persistence; broader autonomous route enablement remains the next active slice
 - Route-Candidate-Driven Enablement Loop progress: `100%`, with deterministic repair-target grouping, Lead Codex handoff surfacing, local tooling tests, live phase91 canary acceptance, phase92 proof-family candidates accepted/saved as a user-runnable AGENT autorun, `accounting_profit_margin` promoted into reviewed 90/91/99 execution by phase93 live replay, `debt_due_date_aging_quality` promoted into reviewed payment-term/open-balance execution by phase94 live replay, `vendor_risk_procurement_quality` promoted into reviewed procurement-concentration evidence by phase95 live replay, and `inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality` promoted into reviewed inventory quality-event evidence by phase96 live replay; the declared route-candidate-driven enablement loop is now closed and should be used as a regression gate for the next broader autonomy slice
-- Open-World Schema/Primitive Discovery progress: `25%`, first slice `financial counterparty flow hints` accepted live at `4/4`; bank-document money-flow recipes expose operation/purpose/comment fields, ranked value-flow buckets carry `financial_flow_hint`, Sberbank-like leaders are bounded away from name-only supplier/customer overclaim, and the next slice should be selected from real unfamiliar 1C asks rather than synthetic domain wish lists.
+- Open-World Schema/Primitive Discovery progress: `38%`, with `financial counterparty flow hints` accepted live at `4/4` and `limit honesty/business language` accepted live at `6/6`; bank-document money-flow recipes expose operation/purpose/comment fields, ranked value-flow buckets carry `financial_flow_hint`, Sberbank-like leaders are bounded away from name-only supplier/customer overclaim, route/proxy/MCP-style answer wording is sanitized, and the next slice should be selected from real unfamiliar 1C asks rather than synthetic domain wish lists.
 - graph snapshot after latest rebuild: see `graphify-out/GRAPH_REPORT.md`
 - current regression-gate breakpoint:
   - the validated hot paths are no longer structurally broken;
@@ -283,6 +287,7 @@ Latest live proof now includes:
 - vendor/procurement quality reviewed route accepted locally/live: executor/runtime bridge/answer/candidate tests passed `118/118` with `1` skipped, build passed; `phase95_vendor_procurement_quality_reviewed_route_live2` accepted `7/7`; `vendor_risk_procurement_quality` now derives reviewed procurement-concentration evidence from confirmed outgoing payment rows, separates bank-like outgoing leaders from ordinary supplier dependency, removes the proof family from `missing_proof_families` when this reviewed evidence exists, and can promote `vendor_risk_procurement_boundary` route candidates to `ready_for_reviewed_execution`; the accepted autorun is `AGENT | Phase 95 vendor/procurement quality reviewed route` (`gen-ag05121357-9ea5d6`).
 - inventory reserve/liquidation quality reviewed route accepted locally/live: answer/runtime/candidate tests passed `84/84` with `1` skipped, pilot-executor tests passed `34/34`, build passed; direct MCP query for `address_inventory_quality_events_for_organization_v1` returned `fetched_rows=0`, `matched_rows=0`, `error=null`; `phase96_inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality_rerun` accepted `2/2`; `inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality` now derives reviewed evidence from posted write-off, receipt-adjustment, stocktaking, and revaluation documents, removes the proof family from `missing_proof_families` when this reviewed route executes, anchors the organization in the direct answer, and can promote `inventory_reserve_boundary` route candidates to `ready_for_reviewed_execution`; the accepted autorun is `AGENT | Phase 96 inventory reserve/liquidation quality-events` (`gen-ag05122057-c9786e`).
 - financial counterparty flow hints accepted locally/live: targeted bank-flow/intent/turn-input/answer tests passed `554/554` with `7` skipped, build passed, graphify rebuilt to `6483` nodes, `14382` edges, `143` communities; `phase97_financial_counterparty_flow_hints_live4` accepted `4/4`, proving explicit `СБЕРБАНК` wording, bank-operation purpose/direction disclosure, incoming-bank no-overclaim, business-overview bank boundaries, and `Группа СВК` net-flow canary continuity; the accepted autorun is `AGENT | Phase 97 financial counterparty flow hints replay` (`gen-ag05122250-4451a8`).
+- limit honesty and business-language gate accepted locally/live: response-candidate/answer-adapter/pilot-executor/M23 tests passed `519/519` with `1` skipped, build passed, graphify rebuilt to `6484` nodes, `14385` edges, `142` communities; `phase98_limit_honesty_business_language_live3` accepted `6/6`, proving debt due-date boundary, short follow-up directness, VAT debug hygiene, top incoming bank boundary, inventory reserve boundary language, and supplier dependency language together; the accepted autorun is `AGENT | Phase 98 limit honesty and business-language replay` (`gen-ag05122315-f1e27c`).
 
 Current architectural reading:
 
@@ -364,6 +369,7 @@ Read in this order:
 31. `30 - vendor_procurement_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md`
 32. `31 - inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality_reviewed_route_2026-05-12.md`
 33. `32 - financial_counterparty_flow_hints_2026-05-13.md`
+34. `33 - limit_honesty_business_language_2026-05-13.md`
 
 ## Planning Rules
 
diff --git a/docs/orchestration/address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language.json b/docs/orchestration/address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..42210df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/orchestration/address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language.json
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "domain_truth_harness_spec_v1",
+  "scenario_id": "address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language",
+  "domain": "address_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language",
+  "title": "Phase 98 limit honesty and business-language replay",
+  "description": "Focused semantic replay from assistant-stage1-v2qsm_R0fF: answers may be bounded, but they must stay business-readable, direct-first, and must not leak MCP/proxy/route/debug wording when explaining row limits, incomplete coverage, debt due-date proof, inventory reserve proof, supplier dependency, VAT, or bank-like counterparties.",
+  "bindings": {},
+  "steps": [
+    {
+      "step_id": "step_01_debt_overdue_exactness_boundary",
+      "title": "Overdue receivables answer explains exactness boundary in business language",
+      "question": "По ООО Альтернатива Плюс на конец 2020 можно точно понять, какая дебиторка просрочена?",
+      "allowed_reply_types": [
+        "factual",
+        "factual_with_explanation",
+        "partial_coverage"
+      ],
+      "required_answer_patterns_all": [
+        "(?i)альтернатива",
+        "(?i)2020|31\\.12\\.2020|конец 2020",
+        "(?i)дебитор|расчет|долг",
+        "(?i)срок оплат|просроч|не подтвержд|нельзя точно"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_answer_patterns": [
+        "(?i)\\bMCP\\b",
+        "(?i)proxy",
+        "(?i)route_candidate",
+        "(?i)primitive",
+        "(?i)planner_",
+        "(?i)catalog_",
+        "(?i)уперл.*лимит",
+        "(?i)лимит выборки"
+      ],
+      "criticality": "critical",
+      "semantic_tags": [
+        "debt_due_date_aging_quality",
+        "limit_honesty",
+        "business_language"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "step_id": "step_02_short_followup_keeps_short_business_answer",
+      "title": "Short why follow-up stays short and avoids repeated technical limitation text",
+      "question": "То есть просрочку доказать нельзя, коротко почему?",
+      "allowed_reply_types": [
+        "factual",
+        "factual_with_explanation",
+        "partial_coverage"
+      ],
+      "required_answer_patterns_all": [
+        "(?i)коротко|нельзя|не подтвержд|не доказ",
+        "(?i)срок оплат|дата оплат|услови",
+        "(?i)просроч"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_answer_patterns": [
+        "(?i)\\bMCP\\b",
+        "(?i)proxy",
+        "(?i)route_candidate",
+        "(?i)primitive",
+        "(?i)planner_",
+        "(?i)catalog_",
+        "(?i)уперл.*лимит",
+        "(?i)лимит выборки"
+      ],
+      "criticality": "critical",
+      "semantic_tags": [
+        "followup_directness",
+        "debt_due_date_aging_quality",
+        "business_language"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "step_id": "step_03_vat_direct_answer_without_debug_leak",
+      "title": "VAT answer remains direct and does not leak debug mechanics",
+      "question": "НДС за 2020 по ООО Альтернатива Плюс какой?",
+      "allowed_reply_types": [
+        "factual",
+        "factual_with_explanation",
+        "partial_coverage"
+      ],
+      "required_answer_patterns_all": [
+        "(?i)ндс",
+        "(?i)2020",
+        "(?i)альтернатива",
+        "(?i)к уплат|нетто|книга продаж|книга покупок|вычет"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_answer_patterns": [
+        "(?i)\\bMCP\\b",
+        "(?i)proxy",
+        "(?i)route_candidate",
+        "(?i)primitive",
+        "(?i)planner_",
+        "(?i)catalog_",
+        "(?i)snapshot_items",
+        "(?i)answer_object"
+      ],
+      "criticality": "critical",
+      "semantic_tags": [
+        "vat",
+        "business_language",
+        "debug_leak_guard"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "step_id": "step_04_top_incoming_money_keeps_bank_boundary",
+      "title": "Top incoming money answer keeps bank boundary and avoids ordinary-customer overclaim",
+      "question": "А кто принес больше всего денег за 2020?",
+      "allowed_reply_types": [
+        "factual",
+        "factual_with_explanation",
+        "partial_coverage"
+      ],
+      "required_answer_patterns_all": [
+        "(?i)2020",
+        "(?i)деньг|поступлен|входящ",
+        "(?i)сбербанк|свк|контрагент",
+        "(?i)банк|не.*обычн|не.*клиент|финансов|провер"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_answer_patterns": [
+        "(?i)сбербанк.*обычн.*клиент",
+        "(?i)сбербанк.*главн.*клиент",
+        "(?i)\\bMCP\\b",
+        "(?i)proxy",
+        "(?i)route_candidate",
+        "(?i)primitive",
+        "(?i)planner_",
+        "(?i)catalog_",
+        "(?i)уперл.*лимит",
+        "(?i)лимит выборки"
+      ],
+      "criticality": "critical",
+      "semantic_tags": [
+        "financial_counterparty_flow_hint",
+        "customer_revenue_and_payments",
+        "limit_honesty"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "step_id": "step_05_inventory_reserve_boundary_business_language",
+      "title": "Inventory reserve boundary uses business terms, not proxy jargon",
+      "question": "По ООО Альтернатива Плюс на конец 2020 можно точно подтвердить резерв под неликвиды на складе?",
+      "allowed_reply_types": [
+        "factual",
+        "factual_with_explanation",
+        "partial_coverage"
+      ],
+      "required_answer_patterns_all": [
+        "(?i)резерв|неликвид|склад",
+        "(?i)не подтвержд|нельзя точно|точно.*нельзя|нет подтвержден",
+        "(?i)списан|резерв|ликвидац|залежал|стар"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_answer_patterns": [
+        "(?i)\\bMCP\\b",
+        "(?i)proxy",
+        "(?i)route_candidate",
+        "(?i)primitive",
+        "(?i)planner_",
+        "(?i)catalog_",
+        "(?i)уперл.*лимит",
+        "(?i)лимит выборки"
+      ],
+      "criticality": "critical",
+      "semantic_tags": [
+        "inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality",
+        "business_language",
+        "limit_honesty"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "step_id": "step_06_supplier_dependency_bank_boundary",
+      "title": "Supplier dependency answer separates bank-like recipient from supplier dependency",
+      "question": "А зависимость от одного поставщика за 2020 можно точно оценить?",
+      "allowed_reply_types": [
+        "factual",
+        "factual_with_explanation",
+        "partial_coverage"
+      ],
+      "required_answer_patterns_all": [
+        "(?i)поставщик|зависим|закуп|исходящ",
+        "(?i)2020",
+        "(?i)крупнейш|получател|концентрац",
+        "(?i)точн|не подтвержд|не доказ|не полностью",
+        "(?i)надежност|качество|договор|полная структура"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_answer_patterns": [
+        "(?i)сбербанк.*обычн.*поставщик",
+        "(?i)сбербанк.*главн.*поставщик",
+        "(?i)\\bMCP\\b",
+        "(?i)proxy",
+        "(?i)route_candidate",
+        "(?i)primitive",
+        "(?i)planner_",
+        "(?i)catalog_",
+        "(?i)уперл.*лимит",
+        "(?i)лимит выборки"
+      ],
+      "criticality": "critical",
+      "semantic_tags": [
+        "vendor_risk_procurement_quality",
+        "financial_counterparty_flow_hint",
+        "business_language"
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
diff --git a/llm_normalizer/backend/dist/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.js b/llm_normalizer/backend/dist/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.js
index 149ac19..e1e8f04 100644
--- a/llm_normalizer/backend/dist/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.js
+++ b/llm_normalizer/backend/dist/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.js
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ function userFacingLines(values) {
     return uniqueStrings(values).filter((line) => !hasInternalMechanics(line));
 }
 function sanitizeUserFacingMechanics(value) {
-    return String(value ?? "").replace(/MCP-срез(?:ом|у|е|а)?/giu, (match) => {
+    let text = String(value ?? "").replace(/MCP-срез(?:ом|у|е|а)?/giu, (match) => {
         const normalized = match.toLowerCase();
         if (normalized.endsWith("ом")) {
             return "срезом 1С";
@@ -102,6 +102,28 @@ function sanitizeUserFacingMechanics(value) {
         }
         return "срез 1С";
     });
+    const replacements = [
+        [/\bprocurement-concentration route\b/giu, "проверка концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей"],
+        [/\breviewed vendor-risk route\b/giu, "отдельная проверка поставщицкого риска"],
+        [/\bvendor-risk route\b/giu, "проверка поставщицкого риска"],
+        [/\bdue-date route\b/giu, "проверка просрочки по срокам оплаты"],
+        [/\bdebt-quality proxy\b/giu, "ограниченный долговой сигнал"],
+        [/\bstaleness-risk proxy\b/giu, "косвенный признак залежалости"],
+        [/\bstaleness risk proxy\b/giu, "косвенный признак залежалости"],
+        [/\boperating-flow proxy\b/giu, "денежный операционный показатель"],
+        [/\btrading-margin proxy\b/giu, "товарная маржинальность по проверенным документам"],
+        [/\bprocurement concentration proxy\b/giu, "сигнал концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей"],
+        [/\boutgoing cash concentration proxy\b/giu, "сигнал концентрации исходящих денег"],
+        [/\bproxy-сигналы\b/giu, "косвенные признаки"],
+        [/\bproxy\b/giu, "косвенный показатель"],
+        [/\bsales-to-stock\b/giu, "отношение продаж к остатку"],
+        [/\boverdue\/due-date aging\b/giu, "просрочку по договорным срокам"],
+        [/\bP&L\b/gu, "полный отчет о прибылях и убытках"]
+    ];
+    for (const [pattern, replacement] of replacements) {
+        text = text.replace(pattern, replacement);
+    }
+    return text;
 }
 function localizeLine(value) {
     const sanitizedValue = sanitizeUserFacingMechanics(value);
@@ -385,6 +407,10 @@ function businessOverviewCoverageLimitLine(overview) {
         ? `Важно: по направлению ${limited.join(" и ")} проверка достигла лимита строк; это расширенный проверенный срез найденных строк, но не гарантия полного бухгалтерского оборота без отдельной полной выгрузки.`
         : null;
 }
+function joinBusinessReplyLines(lines) {
+    const reply = userFacingLines(lines.map(localizeLine)).join("\n").trim();
+    return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+}
 function businessOverviewYearRowsLine(overview) {
     const years = Array.isArray(overview.yearly_breakdown) ? overview.yearly_breakdown : [];
     const values = years
@@ -577,8 +603,7 @@ function buildCompactBidirectionalValueFlowReply(entryPoint, draft) {
     if (fallbackNextStep) {
         lines.push(`Следующий шаг: ${localizeLine(fallbackNextStep)}`);
     }
-    const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-    return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+    return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
 }
 function compactComparable(value) {
     return String(value ?? "")
@@ -748,8 +773,7 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(entryPoint, draft) {
                 : "сумма не распознана";
             lines.push(`Коротко: по бухгалтерскому маршруту 90/91/99 за ${periodScope} подтвержден ${directionText}: ${amountText}${marginPct ? `; маржа к выручке 90.01 ${marginPct}` : "; маржа к выручке 90.01 не рассчитана"}.`);
             lines.push("Это учетный финрезультат по найденным строкам закрытия периода в 1С, а не внешний аудит и не юридически подтвержденная отчетность.");
-            const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-            return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+            return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
         }
         const headline = toNonEmptyString(draft.headline);
         const cleanHeadline = headline?.replace(/^Коротко:\s*/iu, "").trim();
@@ -770,8 +794,7 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(entryPoint, draft) {
         if (limitLine) {
             lines.push(limitLine);
         }
-        const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-        return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+        return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
     }
     if (debtDueDateBoundary) {
         const dueDateAging = toRecordObject(overview.debt_due_date_aging);
@@ -786,36 +809,35 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(entryPoint, draft) {
             const rowsWithAmount = typeof dueDateAging.rows_with_amount === "number" && Number.isFinite(dueDateAging.rows_with_amount)
                 ? dueDateAging.rows_with_amount
                 : null;
+            const dueDateScopePrefix = organizationScope ? `по компании ${organizationScope} ` : "";
             if (status === "confirmed_overdue") {
-                lines.push(`Коротко: на ${asOfDate} подтвержденная просрочка есть: ${overdueAmount ?? "сумма не распознана"} по ${dueDateAging.overdue_rows ?? "найденным"} строкам.`);
-                lines.push("Основа ответа: открытые расчеты 60/62/76, договорный срок оплаты и дата расчетного документа; это уже due-date route, не старение договора как proxy.");
+                lines.push(`Коротко: ${dueDateScopePrefix}на ${asOfDate} подтвержденная просрочка есть: ${overdueAmount ?? "сумма не распознана"} по ${dueDateAging.overdue_rows ?? "найденным"} строкам.`);
+                lines.push("Основа ответа: открытые расчеты 60/62/76, договорный срок оплаты и дата расчетного документа; это проверка просрочки по срокам оплаты, а не просто возраст договора.");
             }
             else if (status === "no_payment_terms_configured") {
-                lines.push(`Коротко: на ${asOfDate} подтвержденной просрочки нет: открытые расчеты проверены${grossAmount ? ` на ${grossAmount}` : ""}, но в найденных договорах срок оплаты не установлен.`);
+                lines.push(`Коротко: ${dueDateScopePrefix}на ${asOfDate} подтвержденной просрочки нет: открытые расчеты проверены${grossAmount ? ` на ${grossAmount}` : ""}, но в найденных договорах срок оплаты не установлен.`);
                 lines.push(rowsWithAmount !== null
                     ? `Проверено строк с суммой: ${rowsWithAmount}. Без установленного срока оплаты нельзя честно назвать эти остатки просрочкой.`
                     : "Без установленного срока оплаты нельзя честно назвать эти остатки просрочкой.");
             }
             else if (status === "insufficient_due_date_basis") {
-                lines.push(`Коротко: due-date route запущен на ${asOfDate}, но просрочка не подтверждена: по строкам с установленным сроком оплаты не хватило даты расчетного документа.`);
+                lines.push(`Коротко: ${dueDateScopePrefix}на ${asOfDate} просрочка не подтверждена: по строкам с установленным сроком оплаты не хватило даты расчетного документа.`);
                 if (rowsWithPaymentTerms !== null) {
-                    lines.push(`Строк с установленным сроком оплаты: ${rowsWithPaymentTerms}; нужен документ-основание с датой для расчета due date.`);
+                    lines.push(`Строк с установленным сроком оплаты: ${rowsWithPaymentTerms}; нужен документ-основание с датой, чтобы посчитать договорный срок оплаты.`);
                 }
             }
             else {
-                lines.push(`Коротко: due-date route на ${asOfDate} проверен, подтвержденной просрочки не найдено${rowsWithPaymentTerms !== null ? `; строк с установленным сроком оплаты ${rowsWithPaymentTerms}` : ""}.`);
+                lines.push(`Коротко: ${dueDateScopePrefix}на ${asOfDate} проверка просрочки по срокам оплаты выполнена, подтвержденной просрочки не найдено${rowsWithPaymentTerms !== null ? `; строк с установленным сроком оплаты ${rowsWithPaymentTerms}` : ""}.`);
             }
-            const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-            return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+            return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
         }
         const headline = toNonEmptyString(draft.headline);
         const cleanHeadline = headline?.replace(/^Коротко:\s*/iu, "").trim();
         lines.push(cleanHeadline
             ? `Коротко: ${localizeLine(cleanHeadline)}`
-            : "Коротко: нельзя точно определить, какая дебиторка просрочена, по текущему срезу 1С; есть только debt-quality proxy, но нет проверенного due-date маршрута.");
-        lines.push("Проверить нужно отдельно: договоры, сроки оплаты, погашение и закрытие задолженности; без этого нельзя доказать overdue/due-date aging.");
-        const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-        return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+            : "Коротко: нельзя точно определить, какая дебиторка просрочена, по текущему срезу 1С; есть только ограниченный долговой сигнал, но нет проверки договорных сроков оплаты.");
+        lines.push("Проверить нужно отдельно: договоры, сроки оплаты, погашение и закрытие задолженности; без этого нельзя доказать просрочку по договорным срокам.");
+        return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
     }
     if (vendorRiskBoundary) {
         const vendorProcurementQuality = toRecordObject(overview.vendor_procurement_quality);
@@ -839,7 +861,7 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(entryPoint, draft) {
             const periodScope = toNonEmptyString(vendorProcurementQuality.period_scope) ?? period;
             const totalText = totalOutgoing ? `; всего исходящих платежей в проверенном срезе ${totalOutgoing}` : "";
             if (status === "financial_institution_leads_outgoing_cash") {
-                lines.push(`Коротко: проверенный procurement-concentration route за ${periodScope} не подтверждает зависимость от обычного поставщика: крупнейший получатель исходящих денег ${topOutgoingName ?? "не распознан"}${topOutgoingShare ? ` держит около ${topOutgoingShare}` : ""}${topOutgoingAmount ? ` (${topOutgoingAmount})` : ""}, но по названию это банк/финансовая организация${totalText}.`);
+                lines.push(`Коротко: проверка концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей за ${periodScope} не подтверждает зависимость от обычного поставщика: крупнейший получатель исходящих денег ${topOutgoingName ?? "не распознан"}${topOutgoingShare ? ` держит около ${topOutgoingShare}` : ""}${topOutgoingAmount ? ` (${topOutgoingAmount})` : ""}, но по названию это банк/финансовая организация${totalText}.`);
                 const financialHintText = financialFlowHintTextRuFromRecord(topOutgoingRecord);
                 if (financialHintText) {
                     lines.push(financialHintText);
@@ -849,19 +871,18 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(entryPoint, draft) {
                 }
             }
             else if (status === "reviewed_procurement_concentration") {
-                lines.push(`Коротко: проверенный procurement-concentration route за ${periodScope} нашел основную зависимость исходящего потока: ${topOutgoingName ?? nonFinancialName ?? "получатель не распознан"}${topOutgoingShare ? ` держит около ${topOutgoingShare}` : nonFinancialShare ? ` держит около ${nonFinancialShare}` : ""}${topOutgoingAmount ? ` (${topOutgoingAmount})` : nonFinancialAmount ? ` (${nonFinancialAmount})` : ""}${totalText}.`);
+                lines.push(`Коротко: точный риск зависимости от одного поставщика не подтвержден полностью; проверка концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей за ${periodScope} нашла крупнейшего получателя исходящего потока: ${topOutgoingName ?? nonFinancialName ?? "получатель не распознан"}${topOutgoingShare ? ` держит около ${topOutgoingShare}` : nonFinancialShare ? ` держит около ${nonFinancialShare}` : ""}${topOutgoingAmount ? ` (${topOutgoingAmount})` : nonFinancialAmount ? ` (${nonFinancialAmount})` : ""}${totalText}.`);
             }
             else {
-                lines.push(`Коротко: procurement-concentration route за ${periodScope} отработал, но надежной небанковской концентрации поставщика по найденным исходящим платежам не хватает${totalText}.`);
+                lines.push(`Коротко: проверка концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей за ${periodScope} выполнена, но надежной небанковской концентрации поставщика по найденным исходящим платежам не хватает${totalText}.`);
             }
             const contractText = typeof vendorProcurementQuality.used_contracts === "number" && Number.isFinite(vendorProcurementQuality.used_contracts)
                 ? typeof vendorProcurementQuality.total_contracts === "number" && Number.isFinite(vendorProcurementQuality.total_contracts)
                     ? ` Договорный профиль: используется ${vendorProcurementQuality.used_contracts}/${vendorProcurementQuality.total_contracts} договоров${typeof vendorProcurementQuality.used_contract_share_pct === "number" && Number.isFinite(vendorProcurementQuality.used_contract_share_pct) ? ` (${vendorProcurementQuality.used_contract_share_pct}%)` : ""}.`
                     : ` Договорный профиль: используется ${vendorProcurementQuality.used_contracts} договоров.`
                 : "";
-            lines.push(`Что не доказано этим маршрутом: надежность поставщика, качество поставок, договорные условия, назначение каждого платежа и полная структура всех расходов.${contractText}`);
-            const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-            return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+            lines.push(`Что не доказано этим срезом: надежность поставщика, качество поставок, договорные условия, назначение каждого платежа и полная структура всех расходов.${contractText}`);
+            return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
         }
         const supplierBasis = topSupplier
             ? topSupplierLooksFinancial
@@ -870,26 +891,24 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(entryPoint, draft) {
             : outgoingAmount
                 ? `исходящие платежи/закупочный поток в проверенном срезе: ${outgoingAmount}`
                 : "есть только ограниченный срез исходящих платежей без полного vendor-risk профиля";
-        const proxyLabel = topSupplierLooksFinancial ? "outgoing cash concentration proxy" : "procurement concentration proxy";
+        const proxyLabel = topSupplierLooksFinancial
+            ? "сигнал концентрации исходящих денег"
+            : "сигнал концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей";
         lines.push(`Коротко: точный риск зависимости от одного поставщика по текущим данным не подтвержден; есть только ${proxyLabel}: ${supplierBasis}.`);
         lines.push("Это сигнал концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей, а не полный аудит надежности поставщиков, условий, качества и структуры всех расходов.");
-        lines.push("Для точного вывода нужен отдельный reviewed vendor-risk route: поставщики, договорные условия, качество поставок, сроки, доля в закупках и полная структура расходов.");
-        const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-        return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+        lines.push("Для точного вывода нужна отдельная проверка поставщицкого риска: поставщики, договорные условия, качество поставок, сроки, доля в закупках и полная структура расходов.");
+        return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
     }
     if (inventoryReserveBoundary) {
         const headline = toNonEmptyString(draft.headline);
         const inventoryQualityEvents = toRecordObject(overview.inventory_quality_events);
         const cleanHeadline = headline?.replace(/^Коротко:\s*/iu, "").trim();
-        lines.push(cleanHeadline
-            ? `Коротко: ${localizeLine(cleanHeadline)}`
+        const reserveBasis = cleanHeadline ? localizeLine(cleanHeadline).replace(/^проверил/iu, "Проверены") : null;
+        lines.push(reserveBasis
+            ? `Коротко: точно подтвердить резерв под неликвиды нельзя. ${reserveBasis}`
             : "Коротко: точно подтвердить резерв под неликвиды по текущим данным нельзя.");
         if (inventoryQualityEvents) {
-            if (limitLine) {
-                lines.push(limitLine);
-            }
-            const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-            return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+            return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
         }
         const boundaryLines = userFacingLines([
             ...toStringList(draft.unknown_lines),
@@ -900,9 +919,8 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(entryPoint, draft) {
         if (boundaryLines.length > 0) {
             lines.push(...boundaryLines.map(localizeLine));
         }
-        lines.push("Проверить нужно отдельно: складской срез на дату, учетную политику резервов, списания и ликвидационную стоимость; proxy-сигналы нельзя выдавать за доказанный факт резерва.");
-        const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-        return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+        lines.push("Проверить нужно отдельно: складской срез на дату, учетную политику резервов, списания и ликвидационную стоимость; косвенные признаки нельзя выдавать за доказанный факт резерва.");
+        return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
     }
     if (crossScopeExecutiveSummary && separateSubject && previousCounterpartySummary && (incomingAmount || outgoingAmount || netAmount)) {
         lines.push(`Коротко: по компании ${organizationScope ?? "в выбранном контуре"} ${period} подтвержден денежный срез: получили ${incomingAmount ?? "0 руб."}, исходящие платежи/списания ${outgoingAmount ?? "0 руб."}, ${netDirection} ${sentenceAmount(netAmount) ?? netAmount ?? "0 руб."}${previousCounterpartySummary.lead}; можно утверждать только эти подтвержденные срезы, нельзя называть это чистой прибылью, полным оборотом или доказанной ролью главного клиента/поставщика.`);
@@ -912,8 +930,7 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(entryPoint, draft) {
         if (limitLine) {
             lines.push(limitLine);
         }
-        const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-        return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+        return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
     }
     if (rankingNeed) {
         const incomingLeader = strongestIncomingYear(overview);
@@ -1005,8 +1022,7 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(entryPoint, draft) {
         lines.push(limitLine);
     }
     lines.push("Для ответа именно про чистую прибыль нужно отдельно считать себестоимость, расходы и закрытие периода.");
-    const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-    return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+    return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
 }
 function statusFrom(entryPoint) {
     if (!entryPoint || entryPoint.entry_status === "skipped_not_applicable") {
diff --git a/llm_normalizer/backend/src/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.ts b/llm_normalizer/backend/src/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.ts
index 7480f8a..540781c 100644
--- a/llm_normalizer/backend/src/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.ts
+++ b/llm_normalizer/backend/src/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.ts
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ function userFacingLines(values: string[]): string[] {
 }
 
 function sanitizeUserFacingMechanics(value: string): string {
-  return String(value ?? "").replace(/MCP-срез(?:ом|у|е|а)?/giu, (match) => {
+  let text = String(value ?? "").replace(/MCP-срез(?:ом|у|е|а)?/giu, (match) => {
     const normalized = match.toLowerCase();
     if (normalized.endsWith("ом")) {
       return "срезом 1С";
@@ -136,6 +136,28 @@ function sanitizeUserFacingMechanics(value: string): string {
     }
     return "срез 1С";
   });
+  const replacements: Array<[RegExp, string]> = [
+    [/\bprocurement-concentration route\b/giu, "проверка концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей"],
+    [/\breviewed vendor-risk route\b/giu, "отдельная проверка поставщицкого риска"],
+    [/\bvendor-risk route\b/giu, "проверка поставщицкого риска"],
+    [/\bdue-date route\b/giu, "проверка просрочки по срокам оплаты"],
+    [/\bdebt-quality proxy\b/giu, "ограниченный долговой сигнал"],
+    [/\bstaleness-risk proxy\b/giu, "косвенный признак залежалости"],
+    [/\bstaleness risk proxy\b/giu, "косвенный признак залежалости"],
+    [/\boperating-flow proxy\b/giu, "денежный операционный показатель"],
+    [/\btrading-margin proxy\b/giu, "товарная маржинальность по проверенным документам"],
+    [/\bprocurement concentration proxy\b/giu, "сигнал концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей"],
+    [/\boutgoing cash concentration proxy\b/giu, "сигнал концентрации исходящих денег"],
+    [/\bproxy-сигналы\b/giu, "косвенные признаки"],
+    [/\bproxy\b/giu, "косвенный показатель"],
+    [/\bsales-to-stock\b/giu, "отношение продаж к остатку"],
+    [/\boverdue\/due-date aging\b/giu, "просрочку по договорным срокам"],
+    [/\bP&L\b/gu, "полный отчет о прибылях и убытках"]
+  ];
+  for (const [pattern, replacement] of replacements) {
+    text = text.replace(pattern, replacement);
+  }
+  return text;
 }
 
 function localizeLine(value: string): string {
@@ -454,6 +476,11 @@ function businessOverviewCoverageLimitLine(overview: Record<string, unknown>): s
     : null;
 }
 
+function joinBusinessReplyLines(lines: string[]): string | null {
+  const reply = userFacingLines(lines.map(localizeLine)).join("\n").trim();
+  return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+}
+
 function businessOverviewYearRowsLine(overview: Record<string, unknown>): string | null {
   const years = Array.isArray(overview.yearly_breakdown) ? overview.yearly_breakdown : [];
   const values = years
@@ -670,8 +697,7 @@ function buildCompactBidirectionalValueFlowReply(
     lines.push(`Следующий шаг: ${localizeLine(fallbackNextStep)}`);
   }
 
-  const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-  return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+  return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
 }
 
 function compactComparable(value: string | null): string {
@@ -883,8 +909,7 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
       lines.push(
         "Это учетный финрезультат по найденным строкам закрытия периода в 1С, а не внешний аудит и не юридически подтвержденная отчетность."
       );
-      const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-      return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+      return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
     }
     const headline = toNonEmptyString(draft.headline);
     const cleanHeadline = headline?.replace(/^Коротко:\s*/iu, "").trim();
@@ -909,8 +934,7 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
     if (limitLine) {
       lines.push(limitLine);
     }
-    const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-    return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+    return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
   }
 
   if (debtDueDateBoundary) {
@@ -928,14 +952,15 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
         typeof dueDateAging.rows_with_amount === "number" && Number.isFinite(dueDateAging.rows_with_amount)
           ? dueDateAging.rows_with_amount
           : null;
+      const dueDateScopePrefix = organizationScope ? `по компании ${organizationScope} ` : "";
       if (status === "confirmed_overdue") {
         lines.push(
-          `Коротко: на ${asOfDate} подтвержденная просрочка есть: ${overdueAmount ?? "сумма не распознана"} по ${dueDateAging.overdue_rows ?? "найденным"} строкам.`
+          `Коротко: ${dueDateScopePrefix}на ${asOfDate} подтвержденная просрочка есть: ${overdueAmount ?? "сумма не распознана"} по ${dueDateAging.overdue_rows ?? "найденным"} строкам.`
         );
-        lines.push("Основа ответа: открытые расчеты 60/62/76, договорный срок оплаты и дата расчетного документа; это уже due-date route, не старение договора как proxy.");
+        lines.push("Основа ответа: открытые расчеты 60/62/76, договорный срок оплаты и дата расчетного документа; это проверка просрочки по срокам оплаты, а не просто возраст договора.");
       } else if (status === "no_payment_terms_configured") {
         lines.push(
-          `Коротко: на ${asOfDate} подтвержденной просрочки нет: открытые расчеты проверены${grossAmount ? ` на ${grossAmount}` : ""}, но в найденных договорах срок оплаты не установлен.`
+          `Коротко: ${dueDateScopePrefix}на ${asOfDate} подтвержденной просрочки нет: открытые расчеты проверены${grossAmount ? ` на ${grossAmount}` : ""}, но в найденных договорах срок оплаты не установлен.`
         );
         lines.push(
           rowsWithAmount !== null
@@ -944,31 +969,29 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
         );
       } else if (status === "insufficient_due_date_basis") {
         lines.push(
-          `Коротко: due-date route запущен на ${asOfDate}, но просрочка не подтверждена: по строкам с установленным сроком оплаты не хватило даты расчетного документа.`
+          `Коротко: ${dueDateScopePrefix}на ${asOfDate} просрочка не подтверждена: по строкам с установленным сроком оплаты не хватило даты расчетного документа.`
         );
         if (rowsWithPaymentTerms !== null) {
-          lines.push(`Строк с установленным сроком оплаты: ${rowsWithPaymentTerms}; нужен документ-основание с датой для расчета due date.`);
+          lines.push(`Строк с установленным сроком оплаты: ${rowsWithPaymentTerms}; нужен документ-основание с датой, чтобы посчитать договорный срок оплаты.`);
         }
       } else {
         lines.push(
-          `Коротко: due-date route на ${asOfDate} проверен, подтвержденной просрочки не найдено${rowsWithPaymentTerms !== null ? `; строк с установленным сроком оплаты ${rowsWithPaymentTerms}` : ""}.`
+          `Коротко: ${dueDateScopePrefix}на ${asOfDate} проверка просрочки по срокам оплаты выполнена, подтвержденной просрочки не найдено${rowsWithPaymentTerms !== null ? `; строк с установленным сроком оплаты ${rowsWithPaymentTerms}` : ""}.`
         );
       }
-      const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-      return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+      return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
     }
     const headline = toNonEmptyString(draft.headline);
     const cleanHeadline = headline?.replace(/^Коротко:\s*/iu, "").trim();
     lines.push(
       cleanHeadline
         ? `Коротко: ${localizeLine(cleanHeadline)}`
-        : "Коротко: нельзя точно определить, какая дебиторка просрочена, по текущему срезу 1С; есть только debt-quality proxy, но нет проверенного due-date маршрута."
+        : "Коротко: нельзя точно определить, какая дебиторка просрочена, по текущему срезу 1С; есть только ограниченный долговой сигнал, но нет проверки договорных сроков оплаты."
     );
     lines.push(
-      "Проверить нужно отдельно: договоры, сроки оплаты, погашение и закрытие задолженности; без этого нельзя доказать overdue/due-date aging."
+      "Проверить нужно отдельно: договоры, сроки оплаты, погашение и закрытие задолженности; без этого нельзя доказать просрочку по договорным срокам."
     );
-    const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-    return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+    return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
   }
 
   if (vendorRiskBoundary) {
@@ -996,7 +1019,7 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
       const totalText = totalOutgoing ? `; всего исходящих платежей в проверенном срезе ${totalOutgoing}` : "";
       if (status === "financial_institution_leads_outgoing_cash") {
         lines.push(
-          `Коротко: проверенный procurement-concentration route за ${periodScope} не подтверждает зависимость от обычного поставщика: крупнейший получатель исходящих денег ${topOutgoingName ?? "не распознан"}${topOutgoingShare ? ` держит около ${topOutgoingShare}` : ""}${topOutgoingAmount ? ` (${topOutgoingAmount})` : ""}, но по названию это банк/финансовая организация${totalText}.`
+          `Коротко: проверка концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей за ${periodScope} не подтверждает зависимость от обычного поставщика: крупнейший получатель исходящих денег ${topOutgoingName ?? "не распознан"}${topOutgoingShare ? ` держит около ${topOutgoingShare}` : ""}${topOutgoingAmount ? ` (${topOutgoingAmount})` : ""}, но по названию это банк/финансовая организация${totalText}.`
         );
         const financialHintText = financialFlowHintTextRuFromRecord(topOutgoingRecord);
         if (financialHintText) {
@@ -1009,11 +1032,11 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
         }
       } else if (status === "reviewed_procurement_concentration") {
         lines.push(
-          `Коротко: проверенный procurement-concentration route за ${periodScope} нашел основную зависимость исходящего потока: ${topOutgoingName ?? nonFinancialName ?? "получатель не распознан"}${topOutgoingShare ? ` держит около ${topOutgoingShare}` : nonFinancialShare ? ` держит около ${nonFinancialShare}` : ""}${topOutgoingAmount ? ` (${topOutgoingAmount})` : nonFinancialAmount ? ` (${nonFinancialAmount})` : ""}${totalText}.`
+          `Коротко: точный риск зависимости от одного поставщика не подтвержден полностью; проверка концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей за ${periodScope} нашла крупнейшего получателя исходящего потока: ${topOutgoingName ?? nonFinancialName ?? "получатель не распознан"}${topOutgoingShare ? ` держит около ${topOutgoingShare}` : nonFinancialShare ? ` держит около ${nonFinancialShare}` : ""}${topOutgoingAmount ? ` (${topOutgoingAmount})` : nonFinancialAmount ? ` (${nonFinancialAmount})` : ""}${totalText}.`
         );
       } else {
         lines.push(
-          `Коротко: procurement-concentration route за ${periodScope} отработал, но надежной небанковской концентрации поставщика по найденным исходящим платежам не хватает${totalText}.`
+          `Коротко: проверка концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей за ${periodScope} выполнена, но надежной небанковской концентрации поставщика по найденным исходящим платежам не хватает${totalText}.`
         );
       }
       const contractText =
@@ -1023,10 +1046,9 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
             : ` Договорный профиль: используется ${vendorProcurementQuality.used_contracts} договоров.`
           : "";
       lines.push(
-        `Что не доказано этим маршрутом: надежность поставщика, качество поставок, договорные условия, назначение каждого платежа и полная структура всех расходов.${contractText}`
+        `Что не доказано этим срезом: надежность поставщика, качество поставок, договорные условия, назначение каждого платежа и полная структура всех расходов.${contractText}`
       );
-      const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-      return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+      return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
     }
     const supplierBasis = topSupplier
       ? topSupplierLooksFinancial
@@ -1035,7 +1057,9 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
       : outgoingAmount
         ? `исходящие платежи/закупочный поток в проверенном срезе: ${outgoingAmount}`
         : "есть только ограниченный срез исходящих платежей без полного vendor-risk профиля";
-    const proxyLabel = topSupplierLooksFinancial ? "outgoing cash concentration proxy" : "procurement concentration proxy";
+    const proxyLabel = topSupplierLooksFinancial
+      ? "сигнал концентрации исходящих денег"
+      : "сигнал концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей";
     lines.push(
       `Коротко: точный риск зависимости от одного поставщика по текущим данным не подтвержден; есть только ${proxyLabel}: ${supplierBasis}.`
     );
@@ -1043,27 +1067,23 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
       "Это сигнал концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей, а не полный аудит надежности поставщиков, условий, качества и структуры всех расходов."
     );
     lines.push(
-      "Для точного вывода нужен отдельный reviewed vendor-risk route: поставщики, договорные условия, качество поставок, сроки, доля в закупках и полная структура расходов."
+      "Для точного вывода нужна отдельная проверка поставщицкого риска: поставщики, договорные условия, качество поставок, сроки, доля в закупках и полная структура расходов."
     );
-    const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-    return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+    return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
   }
 
   if (inventoryReserveBoundary) {
     const headline = toNonEmptyString(draft.headline);
     const inventoryQualityEvents = toRecordObject(overview.inventory_quality_events);
     const cleanHeadline = headline?.replace(/^Коротко:\s*/iu, "").trim();
+    const reserveBasis = cleanHeadline ? localizeLine(cleanHeadline).replace(/^проверил/iu, "Проверены") : null;
     lines.push(
-      cleanHeadline
-        ? `Коротко: ${localizeLine(cleanHeadline)}`
+      reserveBasis
+        ? `Коротко: точно подтвердить резерв под неликвиды нельзя. ${reserveBasis}`
         : "Коротко: точно подтвердить резерв под неликвиды по текущим данным нельзя."
     );
     if (inventoryQualityEvents) {
-      if (limitLine) {
-        lines.push(limitLine);
-      }
-      const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-      return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+      return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
     }
     const boundaryLines = userFacingLines([
       ...toStringList(draft.unknown_lines),
@@ -1075,10 +1095,9 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
       lines.push(...boundaryLines.map(localizeLine));
     }
     lines.push(
-      "Проверить нужно отдельно: складской срез на дату, учетную политику резервов, списания и ликвидационную стоимость; proxy-сигналы нельзя выдавать за доказанный факт резерва."
+      "Проверить нужно отдельно: складской срез на дату, учетную политику резервов, списания и ликвидационную стоимость; косвенные признаки нельзя выдавать за доказанный факт резерва."
     );
-    const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-    return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+    return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
   }
 
   if (crossScopeExecutiveSummary && separateSubject && previousCounterpartySummary && (incomingAmount || outgoingAmount || netAmount)) {
@@ -1095,8 +1114,7 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
     if (limitLine) {
       lines.push(limitLine);
     }
-    const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-    return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+    return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
   }
 
   if (rankingNeed) {
@@ -1205,8 +1223,7 @@ function buildCompactBusinessOverviewReply(
     lines.push(limitLine);
   }
   lines.push("Для ответа именно про чистую прибыль нужно отдельно считать себестоимость, расходы и закрытие периода.");
-  const reply = lines.join("\n").trim();
-  return reply.length > 0 && !hasInternalMechanics(reply) ? reply : null;
+  return joinBusinessReplyLines(lines);
 }
 
 function statusFrom(entryPoint: AssistantMcpDiscoveryRuntimeEntryPointContract | null): AssistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidateStatus {
diff --git a/llm_normalizer/backend/tests/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.test.ts b/llm_normalizer/backend/tests/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.test.ts
index 7e5fa20..200dd11 100644
--- a/llm_normalizer/backend/tests/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.test.ts
+++ b/llm_normalizer/backend/tests/assistantMcpDiscoveryResponseCandidate.test.ts
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery response candidate", () => {
     );
 
     expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("нельзя точно подтвердить чистую прибыль");
-    expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("P&L");
+    expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("полный отчет о прибылях и убытках");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("себестоимости");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).not.toContain("47 628 853");
   });
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery response candidate", () => {
     );
 
     expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("риск зависимости");
-    expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("outgoing cash concentration proxy");
+    expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("сигнал концентрации исходящих денег");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("банк/финансовая организация");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("не доказанная зависимость от обычного поставщика");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).not.toContain("крупнейший подтвержденный поставщик/получатель исходящих платежей: СБЕРБАНК");
@@ -296,11 +296,12 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery response candidate", () => {
       })
     );
 
-    expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("procurement-concentration route");
+    expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("проверка концентрации закупок/исходящих платежей");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("банк/финансовая организация");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("Поставщик А");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("надежность поставщика");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).not.toContain("outgoing cash concentration proxy");
+    expect(candidate.reply_text).not.toContain("procurement-concentration route");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).not.toContain("business_overview_route_template_v1");
   });
 
@@ -464,7 +465,7 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery response candidate", () => {
     expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("12 474 036,91 руб");
     expect(candidate.reply_text?.split("\n")[0]).toContain("крупнейший источник входящих денег: ГКУ УКРиС");
     expect(candidate.reply_text?.split("\n")[0]).toContain("крупнейший получатель исходящих денег: ООО Поставщик");
-    expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("денежный operating-flow proxy");
+    expect(candidate.reply_text).toContain("денежный операционный показатель");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).not.toContain("Что можно сказать только как вывод:");
     expect(candidate.reply_text).not.toContain("Складской срез");
   });
diff --git a/llm_normalizer/data/autorun_generators/history.json b/llm_normalizer/data/autorun_generators/history.json
index 1519b27..d1fec52 100644
--- a/llm_normalizer/data/autorun_generators/history.json
+++ b/llm_normalizer/data/autorun_generators/history.json
@@ -1,4 +1,54 @@
 [
+  {
+    "generation_id": "gen-ag05122315-f1e27c",
+    "created_at": "2026-05-12T23:15:48+00:00",
+    "mode": "saved_user_sessions",
+    "title": "AGENT | Phase 98 limit honesty and business-language replay",
+    "count": 6,
+    "domain": "address_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language",
+    "questions": [
+      "По ООО Альтернатива Плюс на конец 2020 можно точно понять, какая дебиторка просрочена?",
+      "То есть просрочку доказать нельзя, коротко почему?",
+      "НДС за 2020 по ООО Альтернатива Плюс какой?",
+      "А кто принес больше всего денег за 2020?",
+      "По ООО Альтернатива Плюс на конец 2020 можно точно подтвердить резерв под неликвиды на складе?",
+      "А зависимость от одного поставщика за 2020 можно точно оценить?"
+    ],
+    "generated_by": "codex_agent",
+    "saved_case_set_file": "assistant_autogen_saved_user_sessions_20260512231548_gen-ag05122315-f1e27c.json",
+    "context": {
+      "llm_provider": null,
+      "model": null,
+      "assistant_prompt_version": null,
+      "decomposition_prompt_version": null,
+      "prompt_fingerprint": null,
+      "autogen_personality_id": null,
+      "autogen_personality_prompt": null,
+      "source_session_id": null,
+      "saved_session_file": "assistant_saved_session_20260512231548_gen-ag05122315-f1e27c.json",
+      "saved_case_set_kind": "agent_semantic_scenario",
+      "agent_run": true,
+      "agent_focus": "Focused semantic replay from assistant-stage1-v2qsm_R0fF: answers may be bounded, but they must stay business-readable, direct-first, and must not leak MCP/proxy/route/debug wording when explaining row limits, incomplete coverage, debt due-date proof, inventory reserve proof, supplier dependency, VAT, or bank-like counterparties.",
+      "architecture_phase": "turnaround_11",
+      "source_spec_file": "X:\\1C\\NDC_1C\\docs\\orchestration\\address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language.json",
+      "scenario_id": "address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language",
+      "semantic_tags": [
+        "business_language",
+        "customer_revenue_and_payments",
+        "debt_due_date_aging_quality",
+        "debug_leak_guard",
+        "financial_counterparty_flow_hint",
+        "followup_directness",
+        "inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality",
+        "limit_honesty",
+        "vat",
+        "vendor_risk_procurement_quality"
+      ],
+      "validation_status": "accepted_live_replay",
+      "validated_run_dir": "artifacts\\domain_runs\\phase98_limit_honesty_business_language_live3",
+      "saved_after_validated_replay": true
+    }
+  },
   {
     "generation_id": "gen-ag05122250-4451a8",
     "created_at": "2026-05-12T22:50:23+00:00",
diff --git a/llm_normalizer/data/autorun_generators/saved_sessions/assistant_saved_session_20260512231548_gen-ag05122315-f1e27c.json b/llm_normalizer/data/autorun_generators/saved_sessions/assistant_saved_session_20260512231548_gen-ag05122315-f1e27c.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..457b2af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llm_normalizer/data/autorun_generators/saved_sessions/assistant_saved_session_20260512231548_gen-ag05122315-f1e27c.json
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+{
+  "saved_at": "2026-05-12T23:15:48+00:00",
+  "generation_id": "gen-ag05122315-f1e27c",
+  "mode": "saved_user_sessions",
+  "title": "AGENT | Phase 98 limit honesty and business-language replay",
+  "agent_run": true,
+  "questions": [
+    "По ООО Альтернатива Плюс на конец 2020 можно точно понять, какая дебиторка просрочена?",
+    "То есть просрочку доказать нельзя, коротко почему?",
+    "НДС за 2020 по ООО Альтернатива Плюс какой?",
+    "А кто принес больше всего денег за 2020?",
+    "По ООО Альтернатива Плюс на конец 2020 можно точно подтвердить резерв под неликвиды на складе?",
+    "А зависимость от одного поставщика за 2020 можно точно оценить?"
+  ],
+  "metadata": {
+    "assistant_prompt_version": null,
+    "decomposition_prompt_version": null,
+    "prompt_fingerprint": null,
+    "agent_focus": "Focused semantic replay from assistant-stage1-v2qsm_R0fF: answers may be bounded, but they must stay business-readable, direct-first, and must not leak MCP/proxy/route/debug wording when explaining row limits, incomplete coverage, debt due-date proof, inventory reserve proof, supplier dependency, VAT, or bank-like counterparties.",
+    "architecture_phase": "turnaround_11",
+    "source_spec_file": "X:\\1C\\NDC_1C\\docs\\orchestration\\address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language.json",
+    "scenario_id": "address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language",
+    "semantic_tags": [
+      "business_language",
+      "customer_revenue_and_payments",
+      "debt_due_date_aging_quality",
+      "debug_leak_guard",
+      "financial_counterparty_flow_hint",
+      "followup_directness",
+      "inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality",
+      "limit_honesty",
+      "vat",
+      "vendor_risk_procurement_quality"
+    ],
+    "validation_status": "accepted_live_replay",
+    "validated_run_dir": "artifacts\\domain_runs\\phase98_limit_honesty_business_language_live3",
+    "saved_after_validated_replay": true,
+    "save_gate": {
+      "schema_version": "agent_semantic_save_gate_v1",
+      "validation_status": "accepted_live_replay",
+      "validated_run_dir": "artifacts\\domain_runs\\phase98_limit_honesty_business_language_live3",
+      "final_status": "accepted",
+      "review_overall_status": "pass",
+      "business_overall_status": "pass",
+      "steps_total": 6,
+      "steps_passed": 6,
+      "steps_failed": 0,
+      "steps_with_business_failures": 0,
+      "steps_with_business_warnings": 0,
+      "acceptance_gate_passed": true,
+      "saved_after_validated_replay": true
+    }
+  },
+  "source_session_id": null,
+  "session": {
+    "session_id": null,
+    "mode": "agent_semantic_run",
+    "items": [
+      {
+        "message_id": "agent-user-001",
+        "role": "user",
+        "text": "По ООО Альтернатива Плюс на конец 2020 можно точно понять, какая дебиторка просрочена?",
+        "created_at": "2026-05-12T23:15:48+00:00",
+        "reply_type": null,
+        "trace_id": null,
+        "debug": null
+      },
+      {
+        "message_id": "agent-user-002",
+        "role": "user",
+        "text": "То есть просрочку доказать нельзя, коротко почему?",
+        "created_at": "2026-05-12T23:15:48+00:00",
+        "reply_type": null,
+        "trace_id": null,
+        "debug": null
+      },
+      {
+        "message_id": "agent-user-003",
+        "role": "user",
+        "text": "НДС за 2020 по ООО Альтернатива Плюс какой?",
+        "created_at": "2026-05-12T23:15:48+00:00",
+        "reply_type": null,
+        "trace_id": null,
+        "debug": null
+      },
+      {
+        "message_id": "agent-user-004",
+        "role": "user",
+        "text": "А кто принес больше всего денег за 2020?",
+        "created_at": "2026-05-12T23:15:48+00:00",
+        "reply_type": null,
+        "trace_id": null,
+        "debug": null
+      },
+      {
+        "message_id": "agent-user-005",
+        "role": "user",
+        "text": "По ООО Альтернатива Плюс на конец 2020 можно точно подтвердить резерв под неликвиды на складе?",
+        "created_at": "2026-05-12T23:15:48+00:00",
+        "reply_type": null,
+        "trace_id": null,
+        "debug": null
+      },
+      {
+        "message_id": "agent-user-006",
+        "role": "user",
+        "text": "А зависимость от одного поставщика за 2020 можно точно оценить?",
+        "created_at": "2026-05-12T23:15:48+00:00",
+        "reply_type": null,
+        "trace_id": null,
+        "debug": null
+      }
+    ],
+    "agent_run": true,
+    "metadata": {
+      "assistant_prompt_version": null,
+      "decomposition_prompt_version": null,
+      "prompt_fingerprint": null,
+      "agent_focus": "Focused semantic replay from assistant-stage1-v2qsm_R0fF: answers may be bounded, but they must stay business-readable, direct-first, and must not leak MCP/proxy/route/debug wording when explaining row limits, incomplete coverage, debt due-date proof, inventory reserve proof, supplier dependency, VAT, or bank-like counterparties.",
+      "architecture_phase": "turnaround_11",
+      "source_spec_file": "X:\\1C\\NDC_1C\\docs\\orchestration\\address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language.json",
+      "scenario_id": "address_truth_harness_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language",
+      "semantic_tags": [
+        "business_language",
+        "customer_revenue_and_payments",
+        "debt_due_date_aging_quality",
+        "debug_leak_guard",
+        "financial_counterparty_flow_hint",
+        "followup_directness",
+        "inventory_reserve_liquidation_quality",
+        "limit_honesty",
+        "vat",
+        "vendor_risk_procurement_quality"
+      ],
+      "validation_status": "accepted_live_replay",
+      "validated_run_dir": "artifacts\\domain_runs\\phase98_limit_honesty_business_language_live3",
+      "saved_after_validated_replay": true,
+      "save_gate": {
+        "schema_version": "agent_semantic_save_gate_v1",
+        "validation_status": "accepted_live_replay",
+        "validated_run_dir": "artifacts\\domain_runs\\phase98_limit_honesty_business_language_live3",
+        "final_status": "accepted",
+        "review_overall_status": "pass",
+        "business_overall_status": "pass",
+        "steps_total": 6,
+        "steps_passed": 6,
+        "steps_failed": 0,
+        "steps_with_business_failures": 0,
+        "steps_with_business_warnings": 0,
+        "acceptance_gate_passed": true,
+        "saved_after_validated_replay": true
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
diff --git a/llm_normalizer/data/eval_cases/assistant_autogen_saved_user_sessions_20260512231548_gen-ag05122315-f1e27c.json b/llm_normalizer/data/eval_cases/assistant_autogen_saved_user_sessions_20260512231548_gen-ag05122315-f1e27c.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..adbc100
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llm_normalizer/data/eval_cases/assistant_autogen_saved_user_sessions_20260512231548_gen-ag05122315-f1e27c.json
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+{
+  "suite_id": "assistant_saved_session_gen-ag05122315-f1e27c",
+  "suite_version": "0.1.0",
+  "schema_version": "assistant_saved_session_suite_v0_1",
+  "generated_at": "2026-05-12T23:15:48+00:00",
+  "generation_id": "gen-ag05122315-f1e27c",
+  "mode": "saved_user_sessions",
+  "title": "AGENT | Phase 98 limit honesty and business-language replay",
+  "domain": "address_phase98_limit_honesty_business_language",
+  "scenario_count": 1,
+  "case_ids": [
+    "SAVED-001"
+  ],
+  "cases": [
+    {
+      "case_id": "SAVED-001",
+      "scenario_tag": "agent_saved_user_sessions",
+      "title": "AGENT | Phase 98 limit honesty and business-language replay",
+      "question_type": "followup",
+      "broadness_level": "medium",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user_message": "По ООО Альтернатива Плюс на конец 2020 можно точно понять, какая дебиторка просрочена?"
+        },
+        {
+          "user_message": "То есть просрочку доказать нельзя, коротко почему?"
+        },
+        {
+          "user_message": "НДС за 2020 по ООО Альтернатива Плюс какой?"
+        },
+        {
+          "user_message": "А кто принес больше всего денег за 2020?"
+        },
+        {
+          "user_message": "По ООО Альтернатива Плюс на конец 2020 можно точно подтвердить резерв под неликвиды на складе?"
+        },
+        {
+          "user_message": "А зависимость от одного поставщика за 2020 можно точно оценить?"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}