Planner Autonomy: закрепить metadata lane scoring
This commit is contained in:
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery planner", () => {
|
||||
expect(result.reason_codes).toContain("planner_selected_catalog_primitives_from_metadata_surface_search");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("does not force a lane from ambiguous metadata surface even when decomposition hints mention both documents and movements", () => {
|
||||
it("scores an explicit document data-need over an ambiguous metadata surface without carrying movement primitives", () => {
|
||||
const result = planAssistantMcpDiscovery({
|
||||
dataNeedGraph: {
|
||||
schema_version: "assistant_data_need_graph_v1",
|
||||
@@ -389,9 +389,55 @@ describe("assistant MCP discovery planner", () => {
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.planner_status).toBe("ready_for_execution");
|
||||
expect(result.reason_codes).toContain("planner_consumed_metadata_surface_ref_v1");
|
||||
expect(result.reason_codes).toContain("planner_filtered_catalog_primitives_by_explicit_data_need_lane");
|
||||
expect(result.reason_codes).toContain("planner_metadata_surface_scored_with_explicit_lane_family");
|
||||
expect(result.reason_codes).not.toContain("planner_filtered_catalog_primitives_by_confirmed_metadata_surface");
|
||||
expect(result.proposed_primitives).toContain("query_documents");
|
||||
expect(result.proposed_primitives).toContain("query_movements");
|
||||
expect(result.proposed_primitives).toEqual(["resolve_entity_reference", "query_documents", "probe_coverage"]);
|
||||
expect(result.proposed_primitives).not.toContain("query_movements");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("scores an explicit movement data-need over an ambiguous metadata surface without carrying document primitives", () => {
|
||||
const result = planAssistantMcpDiscovery({
|
||||
dataNeedGraph: {
|
||||
schema_version: "assistant_data_need_graph_v1",
|
||||
policy_owner: "assistantMcpDiscoveryDataNeedGraph",
|
||||
subject_candidates: ["SVK"],
|
||||
business_fact_family: "movement_evidence",
|
||||
action_family: "list_movements",
|
||||
aggregation_need: null,
|
||||
time_scope_need: "explicit_period",
|
||||
comparison_need: null,
|
||||
ranking_need: null,
|
||||
proof_expectation: "coverage_checked_fact",
|
||||
clarification_gaps: [],
|
||||
decomposition_candidates: ["fetch_scoped_documents", "fetch_scoped_movements", "probe_coverage"],
|
||||
forbidden_overclaim_flags: ["no_raw_model_claims", "no_unchecked_fact_totals"],
|
||||
reason_codes: ["data_need_graph_built"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
metadataSurface: {
|
||||
selected_entity_set: null,
|
||||
selected_surface_objects: ["Document.InvoiceIssued", "Register.BankOperations"],
|
||||
downstream_route_family: null,
|
||||
route_family_selection_basis: null,
|
||||
recommended_next_primitive: null,
|
||||
ambiguity_detected: true,
|
||||
ambiguity_entity_sets: ["Document", "AccumulationRegister"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
turnMeaning: {
|
||||
asked_domain_family: "movements",
|
||||
asked_action_family: "list_movements",
|
||||
explicit_entity_candidates: ["SVK"],
|
||||
explicit_date_scope: "2020",
|
||||
unsupported_but_understood_family: "movement_evidence"
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.planner_status).toBe("ready_for_execution");
|
||||
expect(result.selected_chain_id).toBe("movement_evidence");
|
||||
expect(result.reason_codes).toContain("planner_filtered_catalog_primitives_by_explicit_data_need_lane");
|
||||
expect(result.reason_codes).toContain("planner_metadata_surface_scored_with_explicit_lane_family");
|
||||
expect(result.proposed_primitives).toEqual(["resolve_entity_reference", "query_movements", "probe_coverage"]);
|
||||
expect(result.proposed_primitives).not.toContain("query_documents");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("does not force a thin follow-up into a lane when the carried metadata surface is still ambiguous", () => {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user