179 lines
7.4 KiB
TypeScript
179 lines
7.4 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import { ASSISTANT_MCP_DISCOVERY_PRIMITIVES, buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryPlan } from "../src/services/assistantMcpDiscoveryPolicy";
|
|
import {
|
|
buildAssistantMcpCatalogIndex,
|
|
getAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitive,
|
|
reviewAssistantMcpDiscoveryPlanAgainstCatalog,
|
|
searchAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitivesByDecompositionCandidates,
|
|
searchAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitivesByFactAxis,
|
|
searchAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitivesByMetadataSurface
|
|
} from "../src/services/assistantMcpCatalogIndex";
|
|
|
|
describe("assistant MCP catalog index", () => {
|
|
it("declares a catalog contract for every reviewed discovery primitive", () => {
|
|
const index = buildAssistantMcpCatalogIndex();
|
|
const primitiveIds = index.primitives.map((entry) => entry.primitive_id);
|
|
|
|
expect(index.reason_codes).toContain("catalog_covers_all_discovery_primitives");
|
|
expect(primitiveIds).toEqual([...ASSISTANT_MCP_DISCOVERY_PRIMITIVES]);
|
|
for (const entry of index.primitives) {
|
|
expect(entry.safe_for_model_planning).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(entry.runtime_must_execute).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(entry.decomposition_hints.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(Array.isArray(entry.supported_fact_families)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(Array.isArray(entry.supported_action_families)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(Array.isArray(entry.planning_tags)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(entry.required_axes_any_of.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(entry.output_fact_kinds.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("can search reviewed primitives from data-need decomposition candidates", () => {
|
|
const primitives = searchAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitivesByDecompositionCandidates({
|
|
decomposition_candidates: [
|
|
"resolve_entity_reference",
|
|
"collect_scoped_movements",
|
|
"aggregate_checked_amounts",
|
|
"probe_coverage"
|
|
]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(primitives).toEqual([
|
|
"resolve_entity_reference",
|
|
"query_movements",
|
|
"aggregate_by_axis",
|
|
"probe_coverage"
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("can suppress aggregate_by_axis for decomposition shapes that derive comparison without an aggregate primitive", () => {
|
|
const primitives = searchAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitivesByDecompositionCandidates({
|
|
decomposition_candidates: [
|
|
"collect_incoming_movements",
|
|
"collect_outgoing_movements",
|
|
"aggregate_by_month",
|
|
"probe_coverage"
|
|
],
|
|
allow_aggregate_by_axis: false
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(primitives).toEqual(["query_movements", "probe_coverage"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("can search reviewed primitives directly from fact family and required axes", () => {
|
|
const primitives = searchAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitivesByFactAxis({
|
|
business_fact_family: "document_evidence",
|
|
action_family: "list_documents",
|
|
has_subject_candidates: true,
|
|
required_axes: ["counterparty", "period", "coverage_target"]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(primitives).toEqual(["resolve_entity_reference", "query_documents", "probe_coverage"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("can search reviewed primitives directly from a confirmed document metadata surface", () => {
|
|
const primitives = searchAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitivesByMetadataSurface({
|
|
downstream_route_family: "document_evidence",
|
|
selected_entity_set: "Document",
|
|
selected_surface_objects: ["Document.InvoiceIssued"],
|
|
recommended_next_primitive: "query_documents",
|
|
required_axes: ["counterparty", "period", "coverage_target"]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(primitives).toEqual(["query_documents", "resolve_entity_reference", "probe_coverage"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("can search reviewed primitives directly from a confirmed movement metadata surface", () => {
|
|
const primitives = searchAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitivesByMetadataSurface({
|
|
downstream_route_family: "movement_evidence",
|
|
selected_entity_set: "AccumulationRegister",
|
|
selected_surface_objects: ["Register.BankOperations"],
|
|
recommended_next_primitive: "query_movements",
|
|
required_axes: ["counterparty", "period", "coverage_target"]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(primitives).toEqual(["query_movements", "resolve_entity_reference", "probe_coverage"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("can search reviewed primitives directly from a confirmed catalog metadata surface without inventing an unsupported drilldown primitive", () => {
|
|
const primitives = searchAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitivesByMetadataSurface({
|
|
downstream_route_family: "catalog_drilldown",
|
|
selected_entity_set: "Catalog",
|
|
selected_surface_objects: ["Catalog.Counterparties"],
|
|
recommended_next_primitive: "drilldown_related_objects",
|
|
required_axes: ["metadata_scope"]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(primitives).toEqual(["inspect_1c_metadata"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("marks a counterparty turnover discovery plan as catalog-compatible when required axes exist", () => {
|
|
const plan = buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryPlan({
|
|
semanticDataNeed: "counterparty turnover evidence",
|
|
turnMeaning: {
|
|
asked_domain_family: "counterparty_value",
|
|
asked_action_family: "turnover",
|
|
explicit_entity_candidates: ["SVK"]
|
|
},
|
|
proposedPrimitives: ["resolve_entity_reference", "query_movements", "aggregate_by_axis"],
|
|
requiredAxes: ["counterparty", "period", "aggregate_axis", "amount"]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const review = reviewAssistantMcpDiscoveryPlanAgainstCatalog(plan);
|
|
|
|
expect(review.review_status).toBe("catalog_compatible");
|
|
expect(review.reason_codes).toContain("catalog_plan_compatible");
|
|
expect(review.missing_axes_by_primitive).toEqual({});
|
|
expect(review.evidence_floors.query_movements).toBe("rows_matched");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("asks for more axes before document discovery can run safely", () => {
|
|
const plan = buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryPlan({
|
|
semanticDataNeed: "document evidence",
|
|
turnMeaning: {
|
|
asked_domain_family: "counterparty_documents",
|
|
asked_action_family: "list_documents"
|
|
},
|
|
proposedPrimitives: ["query_documents"],
|
|
requiredAxes: ["amount"]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const review = reviewAssistantMcpDiscoveryPlanAgainstCatalog(plan);
|
|
|
|
expect(review.review_status).toBe("needs_more_axes");
|
|
expect(review.reason_codes).toContain("catalog_required_axes_missing_for_primitive");
|
|
expect(review.missing_axes_by_primitive.query_documents).toEqual([
|
|
["document"],
|
|
["counterparty"],
|
|
["contract"],
|
|
["period", "organization"]
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("preserves source-summary evidence floors for metadata and coverage primitives", () => {
|
|
expect(getAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitive("inspect_1c_metadata").evidence_floor).toBe("source_summary");
|
|
expect(getAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitive("probe_coverage").evidence_floor).toBe("source_summary");
|
|
expect(getAssistantMcpCatalogPrimitive("resolve_entity_reference").evidence_floor).toBe("rows_matched");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("turns a non-allowed discovery plan into a catalog-level blocked review", () => {
|
|
const plan = buildAssistantMcpDiscoveryPlan({
|
|
semanticDataNeed: "raw model sql",
|
|
turnMeaning: {
|
|
asked_domain_family: "counterparty_value",
|
|
asked_action_family: "turnover",
|
|
explicit_entity_candidates: ["SVK"]
|
|
},
|
|
proposedPrimitives: ["raw_sql"],
|
|
requiredAxes: ["counterparty"]
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const review = reviewAssistantMcpDiscoveryPlanAgainstCatalog(plan);
|
|
|
|
expect(plan.plan_status).toBe("blocked");
|
|
expect(review.review_status).toBe("catalog_blocked");
|
|
expect(review.reason_codes).toContain("catalog_review_received_non_allowed_plan");
|
|
expect(review.reason_codes).toContain("catalog_plan_blocked");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|