NODEDC_1C/docs/ARCH/11 - architecture_turnaround/01 - project_architecture_b...

7.0 KiB

01 - Project Architecture Baseline Map

Purpose

This note is the compact execution-oriented map of the current project.

It is not a market review and not a historical report. It answers:

  • what the main subsystems are;
  • where the assistant runtime really starts and ends;
  • what already acts as architecture, not as incidental code;
  • where the main structural debt sits.

System Map

1. 1C Acquisition And Probe Layer

Main areas:

  • odata_probe/
  • scripts/* probe and verification scripts

Role:

  • verify read-only access viability;
  • inspect published 1C entity sets and links;
  • produce source-level readiness for higher layers.

This is a prerequisite layer, not the assistant runtime itself.

2. Canonical And Analytical Data Layer

Main areas:

  • canonical_layer/
  • data/
  • logs/

Current runtime entry:

Role:

  • expose normalized read-only data services;
  • refresh and maintain the canonical store;
  • run feature engine;
  • run risk engine.

This layer is the project's data foundation.

3. LLM Backend And Assistant Runtime

Main area:

  • llm_normalizer/backend/

Current server entry:

Role:

  • provider gateway;
  • normalizer runtime;
  • assistant runtime;
  • eval runtime;
  • autorun runtime;
  • session persistence.

This is the architectural center of the interactive product.

4. Domain Orchestration And Acceptance Loop

Main areas:

  • .codex/
  • docs/orchestration/active_domain_contract.json
  • artifacts/domain_runs/

Role:

  • define the current active domain pack;
  • execute scenario-based hardening;
  • store machine-readable before/after artifacts;
  • turn user runs into acceptance and repair targets.

This is a first-class quality contour, not auxiliary documentation.

5. Experimental Routing / Benchmark Contour

Main area:

  • router/

Role:

  • route-selection experiments;
  • store-sufficiency heuristics;
  • benchmark and validation support via Python scripts.

Important:

  • this contour is not the current source of truth for the production assistant runtime;
  • current production routing lives in the TypeScript assistant stack.

Assistant Runtime Map

The assistant runtime currently has these working layers:

  1. provider/model gateway
  2. living router
  3. address orchestration runtime
  4. exact execution lane
  5. coverage / evidence / grounding
  6. answer policy / packaging / debug
  7. session memory / navigation state

Provider / Model Gateway

Current main entry:

Current shape:

  • pragmatic two-mode provider layer: openai and local

This layer is functional, but future-fragile if hybrid execution semantics grow.

Living Router

Current main entry:

Current top-level modes:

  • address_data
  • assistant_data_scope
  • chat

This is where the system decides which runtime contour gets control.

Address Orchestration Runtime

Current main entry:

Current responsibilities:

  • predecompose;
  • effective message normalization;
  • carryover resolution;
  • rewrite protection;
  • continuation contract assembly;
  • address runtime metadata.

Exact Execution Lane

Current main areas:

This lane already acts as a real exact-data runtime, not as generic chat assistance.

Coverage / Evidence / Grounding

Current main areas:

This layer already exists in code, even if it has not yet been named strongly enough in architecture docs.

Answer Policy / Packaging / Debug

Current main areas:

This layer should own answer shape, not truth determination.

Session Memory / Navigation State

Current main areas:

This layer is one of the strongest parts of the architecture today.

First-Class Runtime Artifacts Already Present

The following should be treated as first-class architectural artifacts, not helper byproducts:

  • dialogContinuationContractV2
  • result_set
  • focus_object
  • date_scope
  • organization_scope
  • coverage report
  • grounding check
  • evidence bundle
  • scenario manifest
  • scenario state
  • baseline_turn / rerun_turn artifacts

Structural Debt

The main structural debt is concentrated in oversized modules with mixed responsibilities:

  • assistantService.ts
  • composeStage.ts
  • answerComposer.ts
  • addressQueryService.ts
  • assistantDataLayer.ts

This indicates the following problem:

  • the system already has the right layers;
  • but too many of those layers are still implemented as tightly coupled code inside a few large files.

Baseline Constraints

Any architectural turnaround must preserve:

  • AddressQueryService as exact lane;
  • structured navigation state;
  • continuation contract semantics;
  • selected-object continuity;
  • limited-mode truthfulness;
  • scenario-based acceptance.

Baseline Diagnosis

The project is not missing architecture.

The project already has architecture, but it is still expressed too much through:

  • god services;
  • implicit workflow;
  • heuristic branching;
  • mixed policy/state/answer concerns.

That is the baseline condition that the rest of this package is designed to address.