2.1 KiB
2.1 KiB
Slot3 Recon Report (2026-03-22)
Scope
Target hard check:
posting -> subconto[1..3] -> counterparty / contract / item
Source artifacts:
scripts/recon_slot3_gap.pylogs/slot3_recon_report.jsonlogs/deep_accounting_mvp_gate.json
Endpoint:
http://localhost/buh_test/odata/standard.odata/
Numeric Result
From logs/slot3_recon_report.json:
sets_with_slot3_fields:11sets_with_data_rows:5sets_with_non_null_slot3:0sets_with_joined_slot3_rows:0rows_with_non_null_slot3_total:0rows_with_joined_slot3_total:0
Recon strategy:
- Baseline sample read (
$top) for each candidate set. - Additional targeted reads per slot3 field with
$filter: <slot3_field> ne null.
Interpretation:
- Metadata contains slot
3fields in multiple document line entity sets. - In current sampled data, slot
3is always empty. - Because slot
3has no non-null values, reproducible posting-linked evidence for slot3cannot be produced.
Gate Impact
Hard gate #2 remains fail for objective data reasons:
- Slots
1and2are proven. - Slot
3is not provable on current OData sample because observed values are null.
This is consistent with:
docs/mvp_gate_3_hard_checks_2026-03-22.mddocs/decision_report_odata_vs_deeper_access.md
What Must Change To Close Check #2
At least one posted document line is needed where all conditions hold:
- Slot
3field is non-null. - The line can be joined to accounting posting by:
Ref_Key = RecorderRecorder_TypeLineNumber
- The slot
3value can be categorized into one of required semantic dimensions (counterparty,contract,item) or explicitly mapped as equivalent analytics dimension for the canonical model.
Next Action
- Use Universal Tools in test copy to identify document types and posting scenarios that actually fill slot
3. - Reproduce the same scenario through OData extraction and rerun:
scripts/recon_slot3_gap.pyscripts/deep_probe_accounting_mvp_gate.py
- If slot
3remains opaque in OData despite known non-null data in 1C internals, continue FoxyLink PoC as deeper access closure path.